The reason to bring up the earlier rulesets is to illustrate what the prior 20 years of the game did and to contrast it to the RAW 3.X rules, and to examine them in the light of the FAQ answer.
The FAQ answer returns the interaction of attack spells and illusions back to the 1Ed/2Ed regime, indicating (to me at least) that the 3.X rules revisions featuring the detailed "figment"/"phantasm" etc. categories was NOT intended to alter targeting rules for attack spells.
IOW, while the rules revision RAW prevents attack spells from targeting illusory "creatures," it would seem (evidenced by the FAQ) that this was an unintended result of the codification of the illusion adjudication rules.
The FAQ answer returns the interaction of attack spells and illusions back to the 1Ed/2Ed regime, indicating (to me at least) that the 3.X rules revisions featuring the detailed "figment"/"phantasm" etc. categories was NOT intended to alter targeting rules for attack spells.
IOW, while the rules revision RAW prevents attack spells from targeting illusory "creatures," it would seem (evidenced by the FAQ) that this was an unintended result of the codification of the illusion adjudication rules.
Last edited: