• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

D&D 4E Does anyone agree with me about 4E?

Howndawg said:
Hah! Well I've been playing it ever since Garius Gygaximus wrote the Octavian Edition of Civitas Greyhawkus and I know that anybody who does not subscribe to the Post-Aristotlean Neo-Thomist school of RPG design has no business having an opinion as they probably subscribe to the Pseudo-Platonic school which was thoroughly discredited in the Fourth Genevan Council of 1831.

Clearly you are subscribing to the "mainstream" school of thought on this. I put "mainstream" in quotation marks to display my contempt of it. I then refer to some dusty old book in the New Age section of Barnes & Nobles that refutes it; the title has a lot of words like "conspiracy" "supernatural" "shape-shifting lizard aliens" and "illuminati" in it. I then rant how you're all puppets of the current hegemony, and only MY D&D is the TRUE D&D, not that shape-shifting alien named "Gygax."
 

log in or register to remove this ad




All of OP's concerns would be moot if his characters all carried scrolls of <spell> , like any sensible adventurers.
 
Last edited:


In response to your rigorous mathematical proofs, professional survey data, video documentary evidence and accompanying affidavits from past, present, and upcoming game designers, I declare that this question is simply a matter of opinion.
 

This recent update proves that x is pandering to the y fanbase, and is ignoring the x fanbase, even though numerous x fanboys have also clamored fir this, but I'm ignoring that because x fanboys are a monolithic entity and I represent them as a whole and can speak for them.

Also, y is bad/unfun/ungood and anyone who likes it can't like x because they're mutually exclusive. Stop lying about liking x.
 

Fifth Element said:
Could be.

Better than discussing how much Gleemax sucks, though.

I refute your assertation that Gleemax sucks and claim that the posters/servers/moderators are much better and follow up with a thinly veiled insult directed towards EN Worlds moderators and how they are too strict/leniant and or engage in too much/not enough favoritism. I of course add that everything is IMHO since if it's a humble opinion there is no reason for P-kitty to ban me.
 

Imperialus said:
I refute your assertation that Gleemax sucks and claim that the posters/servers/moderators are much better and follow up with a thinly veiled insult directed towards EN Worlds moderators and how they are too strict/leniant and or engage in too much/not enough favoritism. I of course add that everything is IMHO since if it's a humble opinion there is no reason for P-kitty to ban me.
I subtly imply/state outright that you're an idiot, or at least that your opinions are idiotic.

IMHO.

:)

I add a smiley for extra protection. ;)
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top