• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

D&D 4E Does anyone agree with me about 4E?


log in or register to remove this ad


I note how all those who don't agree with me are Hitleresque monsters who experiement on children and eat puppy dogs, and secretly plot the death of D&D. Having said that, I add that my opinion, though never actually stated, has never been disproven. In the ensuing confusion, I swear about how sick and tired I am of all the arguing over pointless things we know nothing about, while continuing to insult all your grandmothers.

Then wait patiently for my 3 day vacation . . .
 
Last edited:


Someone said:
[A statement of opinion]

I open with a statement apologising that I have not read the previous 4 pages of this thread, then ask a short and apparently innocent question about quoted opinion, which appeared somewhere near the top of the first page of the thread. I calculate that the poster will be forced to reiterate all of his or her arguments from the previous four pages, which will in turn provoke further inflamed responses from the poster's adversaries.

I then steal another ENWorld member's schtick by gratuituously using his sig.

Not Hong "The Firestarter" Ooi
 

Midknightsun said:
I note how all those who don't agree with me are Hitleresque monsters who experiement on children and eat puppy dogs, and secretly plot the death of D&D. Having said that, I add that my opinion, though never actually stated, has never been disproven. In the ensuing confusion, I swear about how sick and tired I am of all the arguing over pointless things we know nothing about, while continuing to insult all your grandmothers.

Then wait patiently for my 3 day vacation . . .

Rant, Rant, Rant...
Asserts that despite committing warcrimes he's actually a rather pleasant fellow when he's not burning villages. And furthermore would never eat a poor defenseless puppy, instead he feeds them useless orphans.
 

Swiftly I create a poll, subtly designed to encourage support for my point of view!

1) I disagree with Cadfan, and am a complete loser in every possible way.
2) I am awesome and studly and agree with Cadfan completely.
 

Swiftly I create a poll, subtly designed to encourage support for my point of view!

1) I disagree with Cadfan, and am a complete loser in every possible way.
2) I am awesome and studly and agree with Cadfan completely.


I quickly reply that the option "who is this cadfan guy and why is he peering through my window with binoculars" is missing, and show that by excluding this option, your poll is useless. I use my Sears ordered degree in pseudologic to create a strawman of titanium that is completely unassailable by any rational discourse. Further, I list vague and only tangentially relevant experience and education that makes me more qualified to create an accurate poll.
 
Last edited:

Rant, Rant, Rant...
Asserts that despite committing warcrimes he's actually a rather pleasant fellow when he's not burning villages. And furthermore would never eat a poor defenseless puppy, instead he feeds them useless orphans.


Having invoked Godwin's Law, and now the Inverse Puppy- Orphan Cruelty Law, I claim this thread dead, construct a throne of my own intellectual superiority, and make a snack of your remaining self-esteem.
 


Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top