lordxaviar
Explorer
I have always used age, well from 2ed on when it was listed in the DMG and I stumbled upon it. I found in 3.5 that some ages were missing, those of the NPC classes, I have taken care of this. Comments?
Having converted lots of pre-generated characters to useable ones I had come across a missing point in the PHG and the DMG. They didn’t give starting ages for the NPC classes. Simple oversight which I worked out. I based the adept on cleric but made it harder, because they would not necessarily have a proper instruction or none at all, the expert would have to spend time as an apprentice so I felt it was more like a wizard, the warrior between the barbarian and the fighter again not quite as structured as a full fighter but not as loose as the barbarian or rogue. and the commoner at the bottom rung being just everyone else.. Let me know what you think going to do this column by column as the forum hates tables,,
Race
Human
Dwarf
Elf
Gnome
Half-elf
Half-orc
Halfling
Having converted lots of pre-generated characters to useable ones I had come across a missing point in the PHG and the DMG. They didn’t give starting ages for the NPC classes. Simple oversight which I worked out. I based the adept on cleric but made it harder, because they would not necessarily have a proper instruction or none at all, the expert would have to spend time as an apprentice so I felt it was more like a wizard, the warrior between the barbarian and the fighter again not quite as structured as a full fighter but not as loose as the barbarian or rogue. and the commoner at the bottom rung being just everyone else.. Let me know what you think going to do this column by column as the forum hates tables,,
Race
Human
Dwarf
Elf
Gnome
Half-elf
Half-orc
Halfling
Last edited: