ProfessorCirno said:To quote myself in the other thread:
"While the 'unrealism' bit is part of the big complaint against dragonborn breasts, I think the crux of the argument is 'It's unimaginative, sloppy, lazy, and panders to the lowest common denominator, and if we wanted that, we'd play FATAL.'"
Moon-Lancer said:I tend to think the roles are reversed. I think it those that have a knee jerk reaction to dragonborn and boobs cheapens the elegance of the figure and reeks of "conservative family values". It reminds me of the kind of people who wanted to shut down d&d in the 70s and 80s. I'm not saying that their any anybody like this on these forums, but anytime people rally AGAINST expression of the body, i tend to get alittle annoyed. I just don't see whats wrong with it.
Kishin said:I think its more people rallying to the inanity of a clearly reptilian creature being given a clearly mammalian physiological character. You're ascribing social context and implications that frankly aren't there.
What's wrong has nothing to do with 'conservative family values' or taboos, what's wrong is that they're given a feature that isn't really necessary. I fail to see how giving a reptile breasts is 'expression of the body'.
Moon-Lancer said:Any time the figure is put to paper its an expression of the body. Any time one thinks of the body its an expression of sorts.
We are anthropomorphizing lizards into humans. We give them them male breasts why should they we not have female breasts as well? Are you going to make me drudge up images of guys with boobs? Sure it surveys no function but guys to get natural boobs from time to time. Also let us not forget that in evolution their is sexual selection. And finely Platypus.
I think a bigger problem would be, how did all these races all come to resemble the human figure. At that point their is a much more complex thing to explain then just why do dragonborn have boobs.
Dice4Hire said:Threads like this make me worry about how capable the gamer community is of actually reproducing. Dragonborn, or not.
Kishin said:Your last point, I agree with its entirely. Why do so many things look Human? Well, the best answer for this is obviously to facilitate your ability to identify with them:It's easier to find a basis of relation for a creature that even only superficially resembles you.
Moon-Lancer said:I tend to think the roles are reversed. I think it those that have a knee jerk reaction to dragonborn and boobs cheapens the elegance of the figure and reeks of "conservative family values". It reminds me of the kind of people who wanted to shut down d&d in the 70s and 80s. I'm not saying that their any anybody like this on these forums, but anytime people rally AGAINST expression of the body, i tend to get alittle annoyed. I just don't see whats wrong with it.
I just wanted to let you know that using words like "unimaginative, sloppy, lazy, and panders to the lowest common denominator" kindof hurts. Now i don't know if this was your view or if you were just sumerizing other peoples view but still.
I wonder if their is a forum were we can discuss this topic further as i think its getting a tad out of hand and might stray were mods would not want it to... no thanks to my post. sorry.
ps do you have a link to FATAL?

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.