D&D General Dragonborn In Your Game (A Poll)

Tell us about the dragonborn in your game. Check all that apply.

  • Dragonborn DON'T have tails.

    Votes: 8 6.7%
  • Dragonborn CAN have tails (cosmetic only).

    Votes: 51 42.5%
  • Dragonborn CAN have tails (and they're not just cosmetic).

    Votes: 17 14.2%
  • Dragonborn DO have tails (but they're cosmetic).

    Votes: 17 14.2%
  • Dragonborn DO have tails (and they're not just cosmetic).

    Votes: 3 2.5%
  • Dragonborn DON'T have wings.

    Votes: 51 42.5%
  • Dragonborn CAN have wings, but no fly speed

    Votes: 18 15.0%
  • Dragonborn CAN have wings and a fly speed.

    Votes: 22 18.3%
  • Dragonborn DO have wings but no fly speed.

    Votes: 1 0.8%
  • Dragonborn DO have wings and a fly speed.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • There are no Dragonborn in my game.

    Votes: 36 30.0%

To play Dragonlance with the 2024 PHB and all its species options (I didn't want to eliminate any when the options are currently so few!), I considered the lore of draconians, who as already mentioned up-thread have both tails and wings.

But draconians also have features that might not be great for player characters, such as exploding when they die. Also the campaign we are playing in has encounters with abishai, which I realized would confuse this topic even more for players who know nothing about Dragonlance. Dragonlance on its own also has "dragonspawn", which are super-draconians, and "noble draconians" which are- actually nevermind. It just keeps spiraling out various dragon-like humanoids whose names all begin with the letter D.

So here's what I did: I turned the draconians into abishai, which basically amounts to a name change and more importance placed on their devilish origins. They still use draconian statblocks from SOTDQ and they still get to explode.

But I wrote that dragonborn are abishai who chose to surrender immortality (a devil's agelessness) in exchange for having their own will separate from the will of Takhisis. This is a more codified version of something that happens in the later Dragonlance books, where the draconians cease to be eternally loyal soldiers of evil and start having their own thoughts and goals.

As part of becoming mortal, the player of a dragonborn has the option to say they either lost or kept their wings and tail. If they keep their wings, then the dragonborn feature that normally creates spectral wings for them to fly with instead briefly revitalizes their physical wings. All other dragonborn mechanics are as normal, and the name "dragonborn" is something these newly mortal people chose to disavow the devils they come from and focus on their literal origin of being born from dragon eggs.

I could have replaced the name dragonborn with "draconian" here since the original draconians are now abishai, but draconian doesn't sound like a name a people would give themselves.

Since everyone else on Krynn isn't going to tell the difference between abishai soldiers who terrorized them for years and mortal dragonborn very easily, I realized this means dragonborn are filling the tiefling "outcast" theme in my version of Dragonlance, which seems very correct for the setting.

But I still had to add tieflings (and orcs, uh-oh!) so players could have those as options, so the lore for those species and their thematic presence is different too.

I should mention the timeline for this game is at the end of current events in the Dragonlance series, so Takhisis has been dead and Paladine mortal for something like 9 years. I wrote that most dragonborn arose from abishai at the point when Takhisis died. But I also suggested there are rumors of "earlier" dragonborn who broke from Takhisis's enchantment even before she died, so that players could make their mortal life older if they wanted.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

They can have got wings and tails but in the first level they are only cosmetic, althought thanks special racial feats they can enjoy funcional tails or wings. With the first racial feat wings could help to jump or to glade, but without fly movement yet.

Now I am missing the spellcales from 3.5 "Races of Dragon". They were a better option if you want a draconic waifu.
 


I'm not sure what cosmetic means in terms of the poll. I answered you can have a non-cosmetic tail because it would be a real tail, and you could describe your character making an unarmed strike with it, for example. It wouldn't have any extra rules associated with it like extra damage though. Basically, my answer is you can describe your character however you want.

ETA: I think this question highlights that there is less consensus about the appearance of dragonborn than some other fantasy races that are more entrenched in the genre, but I don't force my players to describe their elves as having pointy ears. They are, however, recognizable as elves to other inhabitants of the world.
 
Last edited:

I answered you can have a non-cosmetic tail because it would be a real tail, and you could describe your character making an unarmed strike with it, for example. It wouldn't have any extra rules associated with it like extra damage though.
That's the direction I went with it, imagining the tail as something you could clear a table or whack someone with, but nothing prehensile.
 

I'm not sure what cosmetic means in terms of the poll. I answered you can have a non-cosmetic tail because it would be a real tail, and you could describe your character making an unarmed strike with it, for example. It wouldn't have any extra rules associated with it like extra damage though. Basically, my answer is you can describe your character however you want.

ETA: I think this question highlights that there is less consensus about the appearance of dragonborn than some other fantasy races that are more entrenched in the genre, but I don't force my players to describe their elves as having pointy ears. They are, however, recognizable as elves to other inhabitants of the world.

I think you've got it, re: cosmetic. It means you have a tail but you don't get an extra ability for it. You can make an unarmed strike with any part of your body I suppose (ska-doosh), but having a tail would not give you extra reach or damage, like you said. You can still include your tail in descriptions of your demeanor or appearance, so it's cosmetic.

A comparison would be thri-kreen, who have an additional mechanic (Secondary Arms) tied to them having 2 extra arms. In that case the 2 extra arms are functional, not cosmetic.
 

Yeah, I find Lizardfolk more interesting personally.
All my dragonborn are either lizardfolk sports or divine emissaries. (the divine ones may have wings)

The lizardfok (lacerta in my world) as usual for sapient, either revere such mutations or cast them out.
 

Me too, Lizardfolk and Saurials:)
See above for lizardfolk.

I love saurials, but they don't know that they are descended from the cosmos conquering Carnifex (cribbed from this module)

1754833840105.png
 

I think you've got it, re: cosmetic. It means you have a tail but you don't get an extra ability for it. You can make an unarmed strike with any part of your body I suppose (ska-doosh), but having a tail would not give you extra reach or damage, like you said. You can still include your tail in descriptions of your demeanor or appearance, so it's cosmetic.

A comparison would be thri-kreen, who have an additional mechanic (Secondary Arms) tied to them having 2 extra arms. In that case the 2 extra arms are functional, not cosmetic.
Then I should change my vote. To me, cosmetic suggests something like "utterly useless" whereas my response would be that it's a functional part of your body, but it's not going to let you do anything you couldn't have done without it.
 


Remove ads

Top