Dragonlance Lost Chronicles Canceled ?!?!

morgul97 said:
I'm 33 years old and I recently just read my first Dragonlance book (Dragons of Autumn Twilight). Do these books get any better than this? I don't read a huge amount of fantasy literature, so I don't really have a baseline I guess. I have read LOTR and some of George Martin's work. These books are fabulous. Dragons of Autumn Twilight isn't even close to these in terms of quality. I don't want to say that it is a bad book, but it's pretty close. It really isn't good. My question is, do these books get any better than this? If not, I have no interest in spending any more time reading these. Is Dragons of Autumn Twilight typical or is it of lower quality than the others?
The first trilogy is derivative D&D fiction with a few bright spots, little more. The second trilogy (Time of the Twins etc) is better, stepping away from its gaming roots into an intriguing, apocalyptic story. I'd stop there, though... :)
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I hafta throw my hat into the group of people disappointed to hear the 3rd book is in turmoil. Definitely the last big gap of information from the original chronicles
 

I just finished both the original series (Autumn Twilight, Winter Night, Spring Dawning) and the Lost Chronicles two books (Dwarven Depths, Highlord Skies). I found the Lost Chronicles much better reads than the originals. Te depth of character was better as was the story. I liked the original chronicles as a storyline and epic tale, but in writing terms, the LCs are better individual books.
 

Wierd. First they cancel the final book in one of Elaine Cunningham's FR series, and now they pull the rug out from under a DL novel. I haven't purchased any WotC novel for over a year and a half, but I had DotHM preordered on Amazon.

They're already alienating a sizable fraction of their RPG base from 3.x. The -last- thing they want to do is pull the same act with the folks buying from their novel lines.

I can only wonder what the hell is going on, and how routinely can you make bad press for yourself before heads start to roll.
 

Well ...

Okay, if you have ever been involved with freelance writing for, well, just about anything, you know that being on-time is crucial. Publishers are on a schedule too, and the writing is only one part of putting out a book.

The rumor I heard, and it is ONLY a rumor, is that Hickman and Weis were 6+ months late with the manuscript AND were trying to re-negotiate for more money. Now, I am sure that both sides have their own slant to the story. I would guess the truth is somewhere in between.
I am not a reader/fan of the DL series of novels but I know that they have lots of rabid fans that would generate "guaranteed sales." I would guess that WotC can come to an agreement with Hickman and Weis if both sides are reasonable. If they really were late and tried to negotiate for a larger royalty on a late manuscript I can easily see how someone at WotC would be insulted by that and blow them off for a while. Considering the normal publishing lead time, WotC probably doesn't have another open slot until January '09 or later giving both sides time to cool down and negotiate.

Edit: I agree that this is bad press for WotC (again) and poorly handled.
 


DaveMage said:
Tracy Hickman seemed to indicate in the podcast that a late turnover was commonplace for their DL novels.

That may be - but that doesn't make it okay. And the fact that the company worked with it in the past does not morally obligate them to do so now.
 

Umbran said:
That may be - but that doesn't make it okay. And the fact that the company worked with it in the past does not morally obligate them to do so now.

I agree, but I can see the other side too. If a deadline hasn't meant anything for years, and now, suddenly - with possibly the last book they'll ever write for the line - being late is a huge issue, something's weird.

Personally, I thought the idea for this last series was kind of a reach, and while I had read every other W&H DL series, this one seemed like it was going to the well once too many times, so I have passed on it.
 


DaveMage said:
Tracy Hickman seemed to indicate in the podcast that a late turnover was commonplace for their DL novels.


It might also be a simple matter of how late. In the DL thread, it was mentioned that they had contacted WotC about arranging a time to turn in the manuscript and were told not to bother. I'm not sure that means they HAD a completed manuscript or were just close to finished, but that was February, for a July release?

(Granted, we don't know when the July release was set.)

It may be that they were always 3-6 months late and now they were 9-12 months late or something, and that was that.
 

Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top