Steve Wieck said:I believe GoO had about 4? titles on RPGNow now they are at 36 and counting.
And FFG? and FGU? and HDI? and GDW? and FFE? and Dork Storm? and Feder & Schwert?
and the offerings AEG and Chaosium and DP9 will shortly have?
I guess we just see this quite differently.
Steve
GoO had significantly more than that a mere 4 titles. There were at least a dozen, maybe 18. Probably would be more, but that depends on how long ago they signed their contract with DTRPG. Same goes for all the vendors formerly selling through DTRPG. Without knowing how long ago the contracted with DTRPG, we really can't even begin to calculate how that deal may have influenced the growth of their catalog listings on RPGnow.
FGU, well, you could find yourself with problems there. Those games are so old that the contracts with FGU likely didn't include electronic rights. On top of that, many of the games are in a state where the actual game authors now control the game's copyright, while FGU owns only the trademarks involved with the title (just go talk to Jeff Dee over the endless struggles with publishing a revised version of Villains & Vigilantes)
GDW got sued out of existence more than 10 years ago by TSR. By all rights, those publications should be listed under Quicklink Interactive, not GDW. Hell, the Traveller stuff should be listed as publications of whatever Marc Miller's current company is, and licensed by QLI.
FFG, FFE, & HDI, I admit you brought into the fold of PDF publishing, but it took you six months to organize those contracts. RPGnow has for years brought in that many previously print-only publishers one by one. Please stop trying to play up 6+ months of covert business activity as a sudden and shockingly successful push into the market.
Feder & Schwert... Never heard of them. I assume they're one of the foreign language companies you have as vendors? I'm not impressed; RPGnow has a polish and an italian publisher doing business with them.
As for AEG, Chaosium, and DP9, please, stop counting your eggs before they hatch. Signed contracts aren't worth much until both parties are living up to their end of the agreement. And as I recall, there have been a few false starts in online publishing from at least one of those three.
Now, as for not being able to comment on the ownership of DTRPG, can we now assume you're backpedalling from your previously vehement denails of WW ownership of DTRPG?