Dungeon Crawl Classics What is cool to you from a player perspective?

Gotta second this. I was playing DCC for a couple of years before I even knew the funnel existed. At some point it seems to be seen as this requirement, but its a total optional game mode.
The book heavily recommends doing it. That's probably why people think it's an integral part. Also the character creation process assumes you're doing it. It's presented as optional only so much as the book says "hey you're thinking about skipping the funnel? You should really do it."

And I can see why if you're sold on DCC, funnel is great, it gives everyone a great origin story for the party (IMO if you keep it to one session, but a lot of the funnel adventures will probably be more than one session). But if you're trying to sell the system to your friends... Level 3 pregen one-shot ;)
 

log in or register to remove this ad

The book heavily recommends doing it. That's probably why people think it's an integral part. Also the character creation process assumes you're doing it. It's presented as optional only so much as the book says "hey you're thinking about skipping the funnel? You should really do it."

And I can see why if you're sold on DCC, funnel is great, it gives everyone a great origin story for the party (IMO if you keep it to one session, but a lot of the funnel adventures will probably be more than one session). But if you're trying to sell the system to your friends... Level 3 pregen one-shot ;)
Cant disagree with any of that. I do enjoy the funnel but the first several games of DCC I did was straight to level 3. So, I dont think skipping it is a huge loss.
 

Cant disagree with any of that. I do enjoy the funnel but the first several games of DCC I did was straight to level 3. So, I dont think skipping it is a huge loss.
It does set a "bad" precedent for people, as past Level 1 the game us no more or less lethal than any other, but the funnel gives it a certain murderous reputation.
 

After DCC characters level up once or twice, the lethality goes way down. DCC levels are roughly equivalent to two D&D levels, so a level 3 DCC character is about as fragile as a level 6 D&D character -- not very, in other words.
Agreed. I think that the Funnel remains important in that it sets the expectation, the possibility, that death waits around the corner. Regardless of whether or not it actually does, that dramatically changes how people interface with the game, makes it more thrilling.

In any case, Mighty Deeds of Arms is so good, it's a headscratcher that every game hasn't stolen it. And DCC does a great job of making magic (both arcane and divine) weird and mysterious. Characters are rightly nervous standing too close to the wizard or cleric.
Mighty Deeds are so good. It adds so much creativity to the Warrior class. You never have to be content with "I swing my longsword."
 

The book heavily recommends doing it. That's probably why people think it's an integral part. Also the character creation process assumes you're doing it. It's presented as optional only so much as the book says "hey you're thinking about skipping the funnel? You should really do it."

And I can see why if you're sold on DCC, funnel is great, it gives everyone a great origin story for the party (IMO if you keep it to one session, but a lot of the funnel adventures will probably be more than one session). But if you're trying to sell the system to your friends... Level 3 pregen one-shot ;)
From a long-term campaign standpoint, the funnel is also more likely to spit out a weird mismatched party than one that will do well going forward. Amusing when you're not at the table, but playing without a cleric or a fighter for the rest of the campaign because Goodman and the internet think that's more fun to imagine kind of sucks.

Also, at least some of the funnels are pretty heavy handed "unless you do this one thing, nothing your player characters can do will work" old-school-in-a-bad-way adventure designs. I am skeptical many people really enjoy that style of play.
 

Agreed. I think that the Funnel remains important in that it sets the expectation, the possibility, that death waits around the corner. Regardless of whether or not it actually does, that dramatically changes how people interface with the game, makes it more thrilling.
Shadowdark also features the funnel, although it leans toward everyone just starting at level one by default. (On the other hand, the quickstart books feature a level 0 funnel, so it's like a 50/50 split on what Kelsey is pushing at the players.)

What sets the expectation for lethality there is the torch going out mid-battle and the three goblins who were about to get slaughtered by the party instead TPKing them.

I'm confident that most DCC groups that start playing at level 1 will find themselves in real trouble early on enough to learn their lesson as well.
 

Shadowdark also features the funnel, although it leans toward everyone just starting at level one by default. (On the other hand, the quickstart books feature a level 0 funnel, so it's like a 50/50 split on what Kelsey is pushing at the players.)

What sets the expectation for lethality there is the torch going out mid-battle and the three goblins who were about to get slaughtered by the party instead TPKing them.

I'm confident that most DCC groups that start playing at level 1 will find themselves in real trouble early on enough to learn their lesson as well.
I think it's tied in to what you were saying before about level comparisons. Every DCC level is roughly 2 levels of other old-school games. They realized this and wanted to preserve that deadly old-school feel, so they made funnels.

I love funnels. They're so chaotic and fun. I do agree about the singular solution being a problem in a lot of funnels and lower-level modules, but I disagree about funnels spitting out bad parties.

The hows and whys of the funnel are discussed in the book, and I agree with that. You get characters with a spread of stats that don't always perfectly align with the class your group needs. That's infinitely more fun than every cleric having an 18-20 WIS, or a wizard with 18-20 INT. The cleric with the 13 WIS is a lot more fun to play. I've always found that's true. The funnel setup simply reinforces that style.

Players are also a lot more attached to the level-0 peasant who actually survived the funnel than they are of the level-1 character they just rolled up. I absolutely love playing through the characters' backstory like that. Gives the player an instant connection to the character and builds connections between the characters as a group.

I get that it's not for everyone, and that's fine. But I absolutely love funnels. Some of the best times we had playing DCC was the funnel.
 

Enchanted Trinkets Complete

Recent & Upcoming Releases

Remove ads

Top