Irda Ranger
First Post
Ditto.Mouseferatu said:See, I'm in the opposite cap. I dislike the notion of "sub-races" entirely. If the races are different, I think they should be different, both flavor-wise and mechanically. Otherwise, I see no point to treating them as different races at all; they're just different cultures within the same race.
And as others have mentioned, there's no evidence that Eladrin will be "sylvan", as the OP contends.
I like that we now have a tight "expectation" of what a "standard" elf will act like. We can still have characters that deviate from the norm, but not we've just a "normal" elf to compare him too.
We've had the same problem with gnomes for a long time, starting with the 'great divide' instigated by the Tinker Gnomes in DL. AD&D 2e and 3e was never clear on whether gnomes were 'fey naturalists' or 'mad alchemists.' I guess rather than clear that up, they were removed from the PHB entirely, which is fine with me.
If I were doing some campaign conversions:
Dragonlance: Qualinesti, Sylvanesti = Eladrin; Kagonesti = Elf
Forgotten Realms: Grey/Gold Elf = Eladrin; Moon/Wood Elf = Elf
I am neutral at this point on whether I like that Elves and Eladrin are related, however distantly. I would prefer that Eladrin were "sort of outsiders" while Elves (and Drow) are "sort of fey."