Mark said:I didn't realize you'd written for WotC or TSR.
Don't all d20 products say right on the cover that they're useless without D&D rulebooks? Sounds like writing for Dungeons & Dragons to me.
Mark said:I didn't realize you'd written for WotC or TSR.
Siobharek said:In my jetlag-induced torpor, all I could think to reply was, "It's just about as dangerous as poker, ma'am. And cheaper, too."
Wait! Are you saying you've met people who have heard of LARPing but not heard of D&D? <boogle> Or perhaps you mean that after you describe D&D, they come away with an impression that we (not they) would call LARPing. That I can buy.CarlZog said:I've found that for a lot of people, "take on the part of a character" equates with dressing up and running around. Many I meet think D&D is the same as LARPing. Getting over that hump is the first challenge. I usually compare it to games most people know and understand. "It's no different than pretending to be a detective or real estate developer in games like Clue and Monopoly, only a lot more detailed. You play it sitting at a table; you decide what you want to do; and the rules tell you what happens."
drnuncheon said:Is there anything he can't turn into 'original D&D is superior'?
"I was walking down to the grocery store today when I saw a man walking a small dog. (The original rules for small dogs set out by Gary Gygax were of course far superior to the d02 rules.) At the store I purchased my groceries and the clerk got upset when I told him he should be using the original D&D 'gp' prices rather than these newfangled d02 Modern 'dollars'..."
Nope, that's a good thing. We're all ignorant about something, and I think sometimes we're(we be gamers) very hypocritical with things. While I agree that people thinking D&D is Satanic is foolish, we've had threads here on ENWorld with people looking down on LARP, older(or newer) versions of D&D, and other games in much the same way. Sure, not as extreme, but the idea is still there.fredramsey said:Too bad ignorance isn't painful.