Not if he heeded my words and simply made it a masterwork double sword and described it as having two katana blades.
Villano said:Sheesh...Somewhere along the way my original post got hijacked and mutated.
Villano said:Let's start this over:
Villano said:Hey, does anyone know the name of that big a$$ japanese weapon that looks like a two-bladed katana, but isn't?
Villano said:So, I take it then that no one would know if any stats on it were created? I could have sworn that I once saw them, but, hey, I could be mistaken.
Villano said:Some people think that the weapon would be too powerful if it did 1d10/1d10 damage? Okay, I'll use the regular weapon.
Villano said:Now how does that exotic weapon feat work with this blade? I see now. Thanks.
Villano said:Corwin, you seem to have misinterpreted my posts from the beginning. I was just looking for any stats on it. You took it into left field when I responded to your question about why someone would want a regular 2-bladed sword when they could have this.
Villano said:The point I was making was that people do choose a light mace over a heavy one or pick one type of armor that isn't as effective as another.
Villano said:And, yes, there are fighters who decide to specialize in odd weapons like dagger or shortsword simply beause they want to ("I want Skill Focus: Taxidermy!" Um, okay.).
Villano said:Now I know you're not reading my posts. I actually said that I was going to use the regular double-bladed sword on my, oh, what was it? Aw, yes, my second post on this thread (right after the question of whether or not it was unbalancing was brought up).
Villano said:The rest of the time I was just trying to explain to you the "Why choose this over that?" point.
Villano said:If other people want to try to craft this weapon, they can knock themselves out. I just added the Monkey Grip suggestion in case someone did.
So what? I never said they couldn't or even shouldn't take such things anyway.
Not fighters in plate armor.
So because I don't agree with you, I don't understand? That's presumptuous and rude.
Not if he heeded my words and simply made it a masterwork double sword and described it as having two katana blades.
In actuality, I don't have any great problem using the standard two-bladed sword if there isn't an official one for the katana.
Corwin said:And yet, you continued to argue in favor of using the bastard sword as the base in a later post.![]()
And besides, that double bastard sword would probably be damned expensive.
I do understand concerns that a 1d10/1d10 weapon may be too powerful. But making it so expensive that you can't pick it up for several levels could help balance it out.
Villano said:I assume that you're referring to:
Villano said:Well, technically, the bastard sword or katana is really a martial weapon. You just need the exotic weapon feat for one-handed use.
Corwin said:I've have been trying to say that you shouldn't make double-weapons out of exotic weapons because it just isn't done. That and the nested feat problem gets weird.
So to try and rationalize the katana as technically a martial weapon (a point I later refute), you show interest in continuing to make a case for using it.
Epametheus said:I've seen the weapon that you're talking about referred to as a Swallow. I've literally only seen the thing in Squaresoft games (specifically, Chrono Chross, Final Fantasy V (some translations call it the Twin Lance), and Final Fantasy IX), though I know the Wind Sword in Onimusha is the same style of weapon. I'm guessing that it was probably considered a horribly impractical weapon.