Experience Point: Keeping Score

I’ve all but stopped giving out XP in my games. I mean, I guess that isn’t entirely true. My last couple campaigns have been Savage Worlds games and I assign XP at the end of the sessions based on how much I feel we got done that night. Some evenings our gaming group tends to chat about work and families and computer games and sports. Some nights you can tell we need time to chat, vent, or share. When we eventually get down to gaming it can mean the session is shortened. I generally give out less XP for those sessions.

Maybe what I mean is I don’t calculate XP. I can recall the heady days of yesteryear when we’d tally up how many kobolds got slain, how much loot was gathered, and what magic items were found. Arcane formulae were applied to derive the magical number of treasured experience points we would receive. These were added to the former total and everybody held their breath waiting to see if the math would grant them a new level for their character. Remember those times when you came up just a handful of XP short?

I love Piratecat’s stories about “Peeps for EPs.” Apparently it was common for the players to bring candy and other treats to the gaming sessions. Around Easter somebody brought several packages of Peeps. A good number of them were not eaten and then became lost behind some gaming books on a shelf or something. A LONG time later they were unearthed during an archeological expedition among the dusty bookshelves (cue Indiana Jones music) and comments were made about how edible they might be at that point in their shelf life.

At the end of the gaming session, a player came up just shy of the number of experience points needed to gain a level. Piratecat contemplated their predicament and offered that, if they would consume one of these stale, months-old Peeps, he would grant them the needed XP. The player did this and their character got their level. I don’t recall if the player survived or not. It’s not the most important part of the story.

But it goes to prove that, for some of us anyway, XP are a really vital part of the game. It is, literally, how we keep score. And over the years I’ve done it in a lot of different ways; some dictated by the game system. I played Rolemaster for 12 years and its XP system has levels of complexity unrivaled by most games I’ve seen. Another game, Powers & Perils (which will always have a special place in my twisted heart), tracked XP separately for every single skill your character had! A friend and I even devised our own XP system that we used for 3e D&D-- it was kind of popular around ENWorld for a while.

Then one day I woke up and discovered I really did not give a crap about XP at all. We were spending quite a bit of time calculating and applying it to the individual characters. It was raising questions about what happened when a player couldn’t make it to the session. It was occasionally even causing some minor hurt feelings when it seemed that certain activities were being rewarded at rates different than some players preferred. I took a deep breath and chucked the whole thing.

I decided to do what a lot of other GMs have done before me and just have the PCs advance in level at a rate that had nothing to do with experience points. Notably, I opted to have them gain a level every three sessions. It was simple; we stopped thinking about XP and simply focused on the game, story, and fun. It was a huge success. We discovered none of us really cared about keeping score using XP. It was remarkably freeing.

Not too long ago I discovered that this same notion applies to life in general. My wife works in the healthcare field and was working in a private clinic. It was often the practice in their office to double book patients. The therapists would bounce from one to the other. Some of her co-workers would beam with pride and say, “I saw 14 patients today!” My wife would come home to me beaten and miserable and say, “I saw 14 patients today.”

How is it that some employees there loved it and felt a huge sense of accomplishment from their work while my wife hated it? Because they were keeping score in completely different ways. Those other folks liked seeing their productivity numbers up high like that, and they liked the pay bonuses they would get as a result. My wife on the other hand felt she was having to subdivide her attention too much and wasn’t giving good patient care. She was much less concerned with how many people she helped and more concerned with how attentive she was to each patient.

I’m happy to report this knowledge allowed her to seek out a job doing home-health care. As a result, she sees only one patient at a time and her focus can be completely on that person the entire visit. Furthermore, these are people so debilitated that they can’t leave their homes to get help at a clinic. While under my wife’s care they are able to progress to the point where they are ambulatory and can get out and about. That is a huge kind of progress and gives her an enormous sense of satisfaction about what she does. Same kind of work. Different method of keeping score. And it makes all the difference.

I see this in my own career change as well. My former business as a videographer was not personally fulfilling. It was using almost none of my strengths and I felt no higher purpose in doing it. So the only good way I had of keeping score was the money I made doing it. I focused on that a lot, often sitting there in the middle of a job mentally calculating how much money I was going to make from it. Bleah. Closing that business at the end of the year was a happy, happy moment for me.

The work I do now as a coach is FULL of the kinds of gratification I seek. What I love most is helping people. As a result, I’ve minimized the money aspect. The client pays me once at the start of the coaching and then I never have to think about it again. I don’t spend any of my time with my clients thinking about how much money they paid me. I don’t have an accounts receivable. I spend zero time doing collection calls. All my focus is on aiding them and that’s exactly how I want it. That’s how I like to keep score.

Do you track XP in your games? Is that an important way of keeping score for you? How do you track whether you are succeeding in life?
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Here's what I would like to establish: XP can be awarded in a way in which the players feel a reasonable and legitimate sense of accomplishment, and that their enjoyment of this way of playing does not constitute evidence that they are lesser human beings than people who do not enjoy it. Is there anybody who disagrees with that?

Sounds good to me.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Pantomime has a larger meaning than just face paint and invisible walls. It's an action. If you do it, that's what it is. Also, there's nothing in the definitions I've found about it being exaggerated or unrealistic. It's communication without words; or communication through gestures. The most relevant definition is " action without words as a means of expression". http://www.thefreedictionary.com/pantomime

Yeah, fine. But just note that the dictionary is the *start* of a definition, not the complete thing. Sticking strictly to a dictionary skips past the cultural context your audience lives in, where connotations lives and breeds. I'm pretty sure your readers aren't consulting the dictionary when they read - they are consulting their heads, and their own experience of the thing. Ignore that, and you court miscommunication. But, I digress...


But see, right there, you are generating their sense of achievement by awarding XP. Note your repeated use of the word "I": "I have...", "I...need to...".

No, I am not some psychic projective empath, such hat I can create emotions and feelings in my fellow human beings. I cannot generate their sense of achievement. I can only create situations where there are few blocks to them finding it for themselves, if they wish. I can make the in-game results of their efforts plain in the setting, so they can compare past to present in story form. I can be consistent and rational in my XP awards, so again they can meaningfully compare past and present, and so on. Both of these call for some work on my part.

So, do I hope to help them find a sense of achievement? Sure! Do I do it for them? Heck no!


The more I think about it, actually, the less I understand your stance. If you feel excited watching an action movie, or cry during a drama, or get "wrapped up" in a book - are those reactions false? They are generated by the author/director/etc. If those are "real", what's the difference?

Ah, you see, I don't think they are generated by the author/director/etc. This is at the crux of advice given to me by my writing teachers: There are three texts - what the author intended, what the author actually wrote, and what the audience absorbs. What the audience then feels about a thing is yet one more stage removed from the author. My feelings about a book, movie, or game are generated by *me*. They are a product of my interaction with the material. Now, the author can present me with material that is easy to emotionally interact with, but the emotional reaction I have is mine, not his or hers.

This is why truly great authors (directors, actors, etc) are rare - because generating material that many people will find easy to have emotional reactions to is *difficult*. Tailoring for one person you know is easy, but reaching the masses much less so.
 

Yeah, fine. But just note that the dictionary is the *start* of a definition, not the complete thing. Sticking strictly to a dictionary skips past the cultural context your audience lives in, where connotations lives and breeds. I'm pretty sure your readers aren't consulting the dictionary when they read - they are consulting their heads, and their own experience of the thing. Ignore that, and you court miscommunication. But, I digress...

I consulted the dictionary in my head. Yours was not available. Mine does not find pantomime particularly offensive. Clearly yours does. Given the disparity of personal definitions, I consulted an official source. And now you are saying that isn't relevant.

I don't care. I'm not going to check with you to make sure I meet your standards of political correctness. I made an effort to clarify my statement and explain my vocabulary. I don't think I'm obligated to do any more.

No, I am not some psychic projective empath,...

I can't even start to address this.
 

Related Articles

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top