Shemeska said:
I want the Tanar'ri chapter of Faces of Evil v3.5.
Will I get it? I doubt it. But I'm hoping for something close to it and as imaginatively written, and something as faithful as possible to the absolutely massive wealth of 2e material on the Abyss.
well, given that the book is about 10 times as long as that chapter, you might see most or all of that material used in one shape or form.

simply reprinting the chapter won't do - you already have that.
Shemeska said:
The brilliant material from 'Planes of Chaos' and 'Hellbound: The Blood War', used as primary sources. The over the top goofiness in H4, hopefully less of that.
Additional flavor for areas of the Abyss that haven't been covered before? Absolutely if it's well written, and I trust that Eric can do so, assuming that he isn't stifled by anyone above him.
same as my previous comment.

given that Erik has already inquired about H4 specifically, i wouldn't be surprised to see that used, again, in some way shape or form. and there will certainly be expansion on all of this; that you can expect.
Shemeska said:
Erik Mona said:
Oh come on.
Have a little faith, people.
Shemeska said:
I want Archfiends to be given rationale in the 3.5 rules for why true deities generally don't screw with them, and why true deities frequently lose when they get into conflict with archfiends on the fiends' home plane.
Erik Mona said:
Shemeska said:
I could do without archfiend stat blocks though unless they're presented as avatars, not the real thing. For the love of God, please don't water them down simply so PCs can kill them and take their stuff at lower levels. It cheapens them and it cheapens the depth of the game if you weaken them artificially to satisfy munchkins, but sadly the precident for this has already been made in 3e and it's likely out of Eric's hands.
i don't think anything has been said about whether or not stats will be given for archdemons (flavor text, i think we can expect plenty of), though my gut feeling strongly suggests that they are going to let the BoVD and Demonomicon do all the talking regarding those stats. they have plenty of other things they want to cover, and that stuff takes up room.
Shemeska said:
I want some touching upon Abyssal pre-history, aka pre-Tanar'ri, something that was always hinted at vaguely but never elaborated in prior material. That said, I want some allusion to the Waste origin of the first Tanar'ri, or even an overt mention of their migration into the Abyss.
i think Erik was also enquiring about that awhile back... or was that just the Queen of Chaos and her brood?
Shemeska said:
I want detail on the Varrangoin / Abyssal Bats, and their civilization before it was destroyed by the Tanar'ri.
i don't think anything has been said about the varrangoin yet, so i can't comment. but perhaps - i think James was saying that there will be some info on non-demons as well.
Shemeska said:
I want some touching upon the rumors of an Astral origin for the Bebeliths as per 'Guide to the Astral'. Exploring this idea would be fun.
i know even less about that - but then, why do you think i've been spending so much time dropping nuggets of info for Mssrs Mona and Jacobs to peruse as they see fit?

you have added another one...
Shemeska said:
I -do not- want chapters of PrCs and feats. The less crunch the better. A writeup of non PrC associated pacts between mortals and Tanar'ri would be quite interesting to see.
sounds like this one is going to be a necessary evil. i could do without them as well, but they don't particularly bother me.