Unearthed Arcana For Ranger fans. Does the UA article ‘fix’ the Ranger for you?

[Yaarel]

For Ranger fans. Does the UA article ‘fix’ the Ranger for you?

 

[Tales and Chronicles]

Not that I had any problems with the PHB ranger, but yeah, I must say that I like the new features better and they make the ranger a little less DM dependent, IMO.

 

[cbwjm]

I was mostly fine with the ranger, the replacements for favoured terrain are pretty good (I'm kind of hoping they change Canny to be able to be selected more than once). I'm not so sure about the favoured enemy replacement though. I do feel they need something there so this might be the best way to go.

With all of the options turned on, you can have a wide array of spells to choose from as a ranger, especially if you choose one of the subclasses that brings in additional spells.

 

[CM]

Pretty happy with it.

 

[Sacrosanct]

I was good with the original ranger. But I also like the changes quite a bit.

 

[Bacon Bits]

I think it's a vast improvement. Natural Explorer and Favored Enemy have never come up in any game I've played in.

 

[Weiley31]

Im rocking the UA upgrades AS WELL as the Revised Ranger.

 

[bedir than]

I did enjoy the 2HD version of the Ranger. It seemed to be an interesting way to fuel a survivalist.

The Variable Features UA compels me to play a Ranger now, even if I prefer the Fighter:Scout a bit.

 

[Voadam]

link?

 

[Gladius Legis]

Pretty much, yes.

Only thing wrong now really is that lousy capstone, but I understand it's a lower-priority fix being it's Lv. 20.