The Sigil
Mr. 3000 (Words per post)
babomb said:I don't see the advantage of using <i>omnipresent</i>, apart from it being slightly easier to spell. (You have <i>ubiquitous</i> spelled correctly by the way.) In many cases, the connotation of <i>ubiquitous</i> is more appropriate. In the same way, <i>enormous</i>, <i>huge</i>, and <i>immense</i> are synonyms, but they don't mean <b>exactly</b> the same thing.
Omnipresent and ubiquitous have slightly different shades of meaning, too... simply put, "omnipresent" refers to one object that is everywhere while "ubiquitous" refers to a type of object that is everywhere; i.e., one that is not always the exact same OBJECT but multiple OBJECTS that are identical.
Air is omnipresent. Telephones are ubiquitous.
For words like ubiquitous... and verisimilitude... there simply is no better word for the idea, and they are not "slang" (like "broken" or "nerfed") - they are words with concrete definitions appropriate for use in certain context, and with no good (or better) equivalents.
--The Sigil