• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

General Discussion Thread X

Status
Not open for further replies.
Velmont said:
I agree with you Rae. If we want to show the best transparency, a judge should be name, even if there is 4 of them involved in it (why I suddenly feels alone :p ). I, honestly, don't mind, but Bront is true. It's hard to keep track of teh sex of everyone, I'm about to use the (s)he pronoun before all my verbs...

I agree with Velmont. Every adventure should have a judge; I don't think it appropriate for players and DM, even by agreement among themselves, to dispense with the requirement. The judge isn't there just for the benefit of the DM and players, but for the benefit of all LEW. Among the judge duties are ensuring the coherence of LEW. A player isn't qualified to slam the brakes on if a DM does something inappropriate, because at the time the player won't know everything that a judge might know. A uninvolved judge, who's read the adventure proposal and can discuss developments candidly with the DM, is needed.

Also, if someone needs to take over in the event of DM emergency, it's easier with a judge who's been following the whole game all along than with someone who steps in and has to come up to speed on a moment's notice. So we should have someone who's committed in advance to being a backup. I've stepped in to rescue games twice, one that I had been judging and one where the designated judge went AWOL before the DM had. The latter was much harder than the former.

Finally, the judge needs to rubber-stamp XP awards. No player should be in charge of approving XP for his or her own character; it's too obvious a conflict of interest.

So, I looked through the game threads for adventures without judges listed:
* Crux of the Matter (Rystil Arden, also with a side thread for Tenebrynn), as mentioned, needs a judge.
* Ashin's Commission (Rystil Arden, multiple threads) also has no judge listed. This is a rescued game; is this another game where we lost both judge and DM? If so, a new judge should be appointed.
* Bounty of the Endless Sands (Rystil Arden (I'm seeing a pattern!)) also has no judge listed.
* Showdown in the Forgotten Ruins (Rystil Arden). I understand this is a result of the merger of Immortality Awakens (Knight Otu judging) and Bounty of the Endless Sands. So is Knight Otu also judging this, as a continuation of his duties from Immortality Awakens?
* S1 (Manzanita) -- OK, so the pattern is broken.

Now, who can judge each of these? High level adventures will inevitably have multiple judges playing, because the qualifications for becoming a judge ensures that a high proportion of the high-level characters in LEW belong to judges. I can judge any of them; I'm trying not to take on too many adventure-judging responsibilities since becoming character judge, but if needed I can. Who else can?
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Rae ArdGaoth said:
Right, but in your example of the +2 Flaming Longsword, you say Flaming has a +1 modifier so it's CL req is 3rd. So if I'm making a +1 Dancing Longsword, 1*3 = 3 (CL req for +1 enhancement) but 4*3 = 12 (CL req for Dancing ability) so the CL req is now 12.

So my question is, where does it say that the +4 price modifier for Dancing (or the +1 price modifier for Flaming) have anything to do with caster levels?

Why is this so incredibly confusing? :(

Read to the end what I have quoted:

SRD said:
Creating a magic weapon has a special prerequisite: The creator’s caster level must be at least three times the enhancement bonus of the weapon. If an item has both an enhancement bonus and a special ability the higher of the two caster level requirements must be met.

You have your answer there. I don't see what is so confusing in that paragraph taken from the SRD.
 


* Bounty of the Endless Sands (Rystil Arden (I'm seeing a pattern!)) also has no judge listed.
* Showdown in the Forgotten Ruins (Rystil Arden). I understand this is a result of the merger of Immortality Awakens (Knight Otu judging) and Bounty of the Endless Sands. So is Knight Otu also judging this, as a continuation of his duties from Immortality Awakens?

Speaking of which, since IA and BotES have probably merged into SitFR, I guess that means the other two adventures ended. There should be 17 GM credits for IA (it started before we instituted GM credits, so it should have the maximum possible number) and 9 for BotES (started last August). I'll wait for KO to approve that, though there's plenty of time--it'll be a while before I spend those credits.
 

Rae ArdGaoth said:
And another question: If my character's about to gain a level, and his buddy has a Headband of Intellect +4, can my character borrow the headband for the night and get 2 extra skill points when he levels up?

Or more generally, how do intelligence boosting items affect skill points at a level-up?
INT bonuses do not give you extra skill points, per RAW. Only insight bonuses granted by the books do that.
 

Bront said:
INT bonuses do not give you extra skill points, per RAW. Only insight bonuses granted by the books do that.
They're called inherent bonuses. Also the level up style stat raises do give more points.
 

KO and I are both judging Ashin's. I'll be the official judge of that. RA was the judge of Ashin's and took it over.

Bounty of the Endless Sands should ahve the same judge as Imortality awakens, as it's an offshoot of that, as is Showdown.
 

Great -- so they're all taken care of. Rystil and Manzanita, could you edit your thread titles to identify the judges?
 

Sorry. Actually Erekose13 is judging S1. The name I assigned the thread was so long that I dispensed with naming the judge in the title. That was probably a mistake. I added Erekose's name to the thread.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top