Chaosmancer
Legend
First of all, being rude does not make me more likely to listen to you. So stop it, it just makes you look bad.
Next, FR wiki is just generally more full than the Wikipedia entry, which is usually just when they were first published and what minis were made. Which is not useful.
Third, please read the words I wrote such as the fact I said the main thrust "could stay intact" as in, this isn't definitive proof, but since it is circumstantially important, and not overwritten by new lore, it could be still considered applicable. I did not claim it was definitely true because of what I found, only that it is more likely to be true, since it was true in at least one place in at least one edition. After all, they didn't cite which of the books used that lore. IT was in the main bit.
Fourth, I just used RAW to mean "what was written officially in the books" if you want LAW or PELAW or some other acronym to be more specific, then fine, but you understood what I meant, so the words got across their intended meaning just fine.
Finally, I'm not sure an official source (since the text had to have come from a rulebook before being copy pasted in the wiki, as it always is) detailing Goliath culture could be considered "random nonsense" in a discussion about Goliath Culture. After all, all of the things from the DnD Beyond website, copy and pasted from the Fifth Edition book wasn't "random nonsense". And, since it is generally assumed that things do not change unless stated to change, older edition materiel might still be considered "true" for certain DMs, especially since FR is supposed to be a continuous timeline(for better and worse).
