I can understand your almost evangelistic enthusiasm for C&C, it is obviously something that works for you and that you really enjoy. However, when you start talking about "how overwhelming the rules can become", "never burn his brain with all the rules and options", "helps keep the spellcasters from becoming broken anyway" I think you need to take a slight step backwards. Some people would disagree quite strongly with such comments. For myself, I enjoy the rules and by no means do I find the metamagic feats "broken". Besides which, as I said before, the OP seems to have made his playing preferences quite clear and does not seem to be in a hurry to be "converted".
Best Regards
Herremann the Wise
I see your point about the OP's stated preference, but just because your evangelistic about 3E doesn't mean I have less of a right to be equally evangelistic about C&C.
Plus I don't care about how other people love the rules overload of 3E, I didn't and don't. Just because others love it doesn't mean I have to, nor do I have to keep quiet about not liking it. Its a fact that 3E has a ton of rules and that a lot of people felt burned out by them. Facts backed up by many people who have switched to C&C.
If I was lying, or didn't know of at least 22 other DM's with over 100 players that feel the same way I do, maybe then you could belittle my burned out feelings about 3E and I would shut up. But I'm not going to shut up. Get used to me pushing C&C just as much as you push 3E, if not more (meaning me pushing C&C).
Us small dogs on the block have to bark louder to be heard and seen over the big dog.
