J jeffman First Post Jun 27, 2006 #11 My 2 cents The way I read it is that you auto succeed or auto fail on 20s and 1s. In the event of a tie, the person with the highest modifier wins (even if both characters roll a 20). Not sure how RAW this is.
My 2 cents The way I read it is that you auto succeed or auto fail on 20s and 1s. In the event of a tie, the person with the highest modifier wins (even if both characters roll a 20). Not sure how RAW this is.
kjenks First Post Jun 27, 2006 #12 jeffman said: The way I read it is that you auto succeed or auto fail on 20s and 1s. In the event of a tie, the person with the highest modifier wins (even if both characters roll a 20). Not sure how RAW this is. Click to expand... That was correct in 3e, but not in 3.5e, as I mentioned earlier.
jeffman said: The way I read it is that you auto succeed or auto fail on 20s and 1s. In the event of a tie, the person with the highest modifier wins (even if both characters roll a 20). Not sure how RAW this is. Click to expand... That was correct in 3e, but not in 3.5e, as I mentioned earlier.
MarkB Legend Jun 27, 2006 #13 I'm almost certain 3.5 included a rule that opposed rolls never allow automatic success or failure, but I can't find it in the SRD. I'll check my books when I get home.
I'm almost certain 3.5 included a rule that opposed rolls never allow automatic success or failure, but I can't find it in the SRD. I'll check my books when I get home.