Habemus Papam

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wulf Ratbane said:
Well, I suppose if you don't like Benedict, the good news is that he's only got 3 years before he's out, then we get Peter (the first Pope Peter since the first Pope, Peter), followed by the destructioni of Rome and the beginning of the Apocalypse.
Hm. Why go to school?
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Moderator's Notes
Heh. This is one of those times that I'd love to relax the political/religious discussion rules, but it's just as much one of those times that the rules are very necessary for this board. Please keep it nonpolitical; there's pretty much no allowance for giving your opinions (positive or negative) of this choice, and I make no guarantees that another moderator won't come along and close this at any moment.

Daniel
 

Wulf Ratbane said:
Well, I suppose if you don't like Benedict, the good news is that he's only got 3 years before he's out, then we get Peter (the first Pope Peter since the first Pope, Peter), followed by the destructioni of Rome and the beginning of the Apocalypse.
Ah yes, the prophecies of St. Malachi of Ireland. I was hearing about that this morning on the Today show. They are certainly very interesting; the last four popes he got with pretty good accuracy (20/20 hindsight and all). Now we just gotta figure out how does Benedict XVI fit into the "gloria olivae" clue he left (though there already are speculations running around).

I have my personal reservations about Ratzinger, but he gets the benefit of the doubt and a chance to do his thing first, so we'll see. I'm far more interested in the little, obscure details that surround this whole process, as they are feeding directly into something we are working on. :)
 

HalWhitewyrm said:
Ah yes, the prophecies of St. Malachi of Ireland. I was hearing about that this morning on the Today show. They are certainly very interesting; the last four popes he got with pretty good accuracy (20/20 hindsight and all). Now we just gotta figure out how does Benedict XVI fit into the "gloria olivae" clue he left (though there already are speculations running around).

I have my personal reservations about Ratzinger, but he gets the benefit of the doubt and a chance to do his thing first, so we'll see. I'm far more interested in the little, obscure details that surround this whole process, as they are feeding directly into something we are working on. :)

I share your... thoughts in the second paragraph and will refrain from saying anything else on that.
As for Benedict- the Benedictine monastic order is also known as the Olivine Order, IIRC (which I why I suspect he chose the name- he's not docternally similar to the previous few Benedicts). There is also a Jewish connection (previously mentioned and deleted, wisely) but that is pretty week.
We'll see in three years :confused:
 


Mystery Man said:
Forced into (like anyone had a choice) and later deserted going home. When the americans came through his village he was put into a POW camp.

That's right I gorgot that every member of the Hitler Youth didn't want to be there.

And every single Frenchmen was part of the resistance.

Surely if we can talk about the new Pope merits, we can talk about his history and flaws as well.
 

He's apparently the oldest man to be elected Pope, so his papacy will probably be one of the shortest.
 

Jdvn1 said:
He's apparently the oldest man to be elected Pope, so his papacy will probably be one of the shortest.

Except that medical science keeps advancing as well. so you just never know nowadays... :)


Surely if we can talk about the new Pope merits, we can talk about his history and flaws as well.

If you consider a flaw the fact that he was 12 years old in 1939....You'd probably be more accurate in stating that the flaw was in his parents.

Anyhow I'd rather give the guy the benefit of the doubt.
 


Status
Not open for further replies.

Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top