half orcs and orc double axe

Mistwell said:


Again, the Half-Orc entry in the PHB page 19, under "Orc Blood" it says:
Half-orcs, for example, can use special orc weapons...

Then, the Orc Double Axes entry in the PHB page 99:

An orc double axe...

Note the title of the weapon is directly incorporated into the description. This isn't fluff in my opinion. I believe it is a special orc weapon. If it is a special orc weapon, the half-orc is proficient in it because of their "Orc Blood" bonus.

Well, how about this.
You're right, the HalfOrc CAN use the Orc Double Axe, since he has orc blood!

Of course, he's not proficient in it, so it'll be at a penalty.

If a half-orc wizard grabbed up a Battleaxe that was +4 in the hands of those of orc blood, he would gain the +4 bonus, but he still wouldn't be proficient in battleaxes, nay?

So, sure, a half-orc can use an orc double axe, but then, so can anyone else.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Orc blood (elf blood for half elves, too) arn't 'scams', nor in my opinion are they even abilities (elves, after all, don't have the elven bolld ability.... nor do dwarves). The're a simple rules clasification. This leaves both races a bit lacking in special benifits aside from vision in my opinion, but it's not too big of a deal.
 

Tewligan said:

Oooh, man. After reading the first couple of posts in this thread, I thought of that. You beat me to the punch. That was the first issue of Dragon I ever got, and that module rocked hard. Wasn't that the issue with the write-up on the Deryni also?

Yes, that same issue had the expanded (optional) rules for psionics tht almost got converted in their entirety into the 2e Psionics system, as well as the Deryni and more goodness. It's one of my favorite issues.

I think I've run that module (Citadel by the Sea) about four times total with different gaming groups. The half-orc in our currently on-hold game STILL uses Alkarg quite a bit, and just stopped wearing the magic orc rings about a level ago (they are level 11 now).
 

Mistwell said:


Again, special orc weapons are a distinct class of items from magic items with properties that only function for orcs. The PHB makes this very clear. It describes BOTH types of weapons. One is mundane, one is magic, both are keyed to orcs, both are usable by Half-orcs as if they were orcs. However, they are not the same type of item. If you don't believe me, go read the orc-blood entry yourself. It's pretty clear.

You are absolutely right. Half-orcs can use an orc double axe as if they were orcs. Flipping open our handy MM to pages 146-147, we find the description of orcs as a race. Hmm...nothing in there about orcs gaining racial proficiency with an orc double axe.

OK, we'll check the PHB just in case. The orc double axe is described on 99 - and again, nothing about orcs receiving racial proficiency with the weapon.

So, a half-orc can indeed use an orc double axe just as if he were an orc - however this is a condition which gives him absolutely no benefit whatsoever.

J
 

Guys, that orc blood thing (or halfelves with elven blood) is VERY important for orcbane weapons.

Or elfbane weapons.

In some ScarredLands supplements, there are weapons that work as +1 rapier for anyone and as +2 rapiers with +2 strength enhancement for elves.

Elven blood is very important there.
 

Mistwell said:
It says throwing stones. The "halfing stones" were not detailed until S&F, the first splat book, but I believe the intent was to provide detail on the "halfling stones". If it isn't the skiprocks, then the halflings should be proficient with throwing stones of some kind, no matter their class. And thrown stones DO some damage. If they should not have this proficiency, tell me why they shouldn't?

It says a thrown weapon. They go on to explain that throwing stones is a universal sport among halflings, and that they develop especially good aim.
Because they throw stones around all day they're really good in throwing things around. Not just stones, but everything that is thrown. They aren't proficient with any thrown weapon per se, but they are good at throwing things generally. Therefore no proficiency but an attack bonus.



Unique or special was what I was talking about. For elves, it is special. And it's a huge advantage for the non-combat classes to have that proficiency. Far more of an advantage, I think, that allowing the couple of special race-specific items we are talking about.

The Problem is that we're talking about exotic weapons. Weapons that are so powerful that no class has built-in proficiency in them. Like a medium-size weapon with 1d10 damage, or a double weapon with 1d8/1d8 damage.

The elves get proficiencies in some martial weapons. If they've got a class that doesn't grant proficiency in those weapons, they probably won't use that weapon overmuch, since they're not good at weapons in general: an elven wizard may have a longsword, but he will use it only occasionally since he's so much better with a fireball. The elven rogue might use a composite longbow instead of a comp. shortbow, but that +1 average damage won't do anything when you land a sneak attack with several d6, and a longsword won't be to useful to a rogue (and the rapier belongs to the rogues proficiencies anyway). If a elven character uses those weapon a lot, he'll be fighter or so anyway and they are proficient with all martial weapons.

But if you give the dwarves the dwarven war axe every dwarven fighter will not even consider taking the battleaxe, since he can use the dwarven war axe with more damage without having to spend a feat. The human axe-wielding fighter, on the other hand, must choose to have 1d8 damage or spend a feat and have 1d10 damage. The elven fighter uses the longsword without thinking, as does the human fighter, since both are proficient with the longsword without having to spend a feat

The orc-blood and elf-blood entries say "special orc weapons" and "elven weapons" (respectively). They ALSO say "magic items with racially specific orc powers" and "magic items with racially specific elven powers" (respectively). That means there are mundane, non-magical special orc weapons and elven weapons that half-orcs and half-elves can use, even if they did not grow up in an orc or elf community. Why would that be? How about because it is in their blood, as the orc-blood and elf-blood entries imply. Can you give me a better reason why the "blood" entry would specify use of special orc/elf weapons for these halfbreeds?

A "special orc weapon" would be something like a sword who has +1 in anyone's hand but becomes +3 in the hand of an orc.

A "magic item with specific orc powers" is something like a circlet of intimidate that only works for orcs.

Both of the above-mentioned could be used by orcs and half-orcs as well.

Because, as someone already said, they are virtually useless weapons without the ambidexterity and two-weapon fighting feats.

The orc double axe is a powerful double weapon, having d8/d8 damage. An (half-)orc fighter would only need to spend two feats (ambidex and twf) to fight properly with it, if you gave them that proficiency). The human fighter would need to spend three feats with it.

The dwarven war axe is a medium size weapon that deals 1d10 damage. No ambidexterity, no two weapon fighting needed. I don't call that useless.

Halfling Skip Rocks are thrown weapon which hit two enemies at once (quite deadly in the hands of a strong dwarven fighter). Not exactly useless.

My point is, that those proficiencies can ONLY be aquired via a feat. So, even the fighting classes need to spend one to be proficient with such a weapon. The elven weapons are part of many a class proficiency list, and those that don't have it will have not that much use for them (I don't say it's useless, but I deresay that an exotic medium-sized weapon with 1d10 damage is far more useful to a fighter than a martial medium-sized weapon with 1d8 damage is to a wizard). Considering that those races are already balanced against elves, they will be more powerful than elves if you allow it (unless you give elves an additional +1 on all attack rolls with those weapons, that should put it in line).
 

reapersaurus said:
Look.

Any DM that I was playing with that would deny a half-orc PC that really wanted the use of those 2 orc weapons just because it's not in the rules can bite me.

Who would do that? And how would he expain it: "As you want to touch that orc double axe, which is used by your human friend, your half-orc gets joltet by electrical energy from out of the weapon handle until he drops the weapon." ? This is a D&D 3e forum, not one for AD&D 2e, where such curiousities were commonplace.
Noone wants to deny half-orcs the use of those weapons. They just don't get proficient with it.


And anyone explaining to me that using an axe is in a dwarf's blood better bring a genetics expert along which can explain me that.
Most dwarves may use an axe, but then, most dwarves are fighters. The other ones, other than paladins ("crusaders"), barbarians ("battleragers") and rangers ("cavers"), aren't necessarily trained in the use of any axe (unless the're war priests of clangeddin or spend a feat. Or multiclass as fighters, which is always an option with your average Johhny Dwarf).

Elves, on the other hand, have so much time before they're old enough to go on adventures that they don't know what to do with it, so they spend some years training with bows and swords, or sparring just for fun (should be as popular with elves as rock hurling is with halflings). After all, even in a 1000-elves-settlement, the elven lad will spend no more than 20 years until he knows all the lasses inside-out :cool:
 

Mistwell said:


Again, special orc weapons are a distinct class of items from magic items with properties that only function for orcs. The PHB makes this very clear. It describes BOTH types of weapons. One is mundane, one is magic, both are keyed to orcs, both are usable by Half-orcs as if they were orcs. However, they are not the same type of item. If you don't believe me, go read the orc-blood entry yourself. It's pretty clear.

I disagree, but regardless of that, a double-axe is very clearly not an "orc special weapon".

Orcs are not automatically proficient with it, so why would half orcs be? You still have not answered that very simple question.
 
Last edited:

KaeYoss said:
My point is, that those proficiencies can ONLY be aquired via a feat. So, even the fighting classes need to spend one to be proficient with such a weapon. The elven weapons are part of many a class proficiency list, and those that don't have it will have not that much use for them (I don't say it's useless, but I deresay that an exotic medium-sized weapon with 1d10 damage is far more useful to a fighter than a martial medium-sized weapon with 1d8 damage is to a wizard). Considering that those races are already balanced against elves, they will be more powerful than elves if you allow it (unless you give elves an additional +1 on all attack rolls with those weapons, that should put it in line).
So your reason against House Ruling that orcs and half-orcs automatically get racial weapon proficiencies of Orc Double-Axe and Orcish Shotput is because it would make the Dwarf too strong of class?

Nice way to stick it to the half-orc.
As if they're not nailed enough already. :rolleyes:
 

errr.

You can house rule that half orcs are Huge and have 12 arms if you want to. Nobody can tell you what you can and cannot house rule. The dispute here is whether it is *in* the rules as written that half orcs get such proficiency, and it has not been proven satisfactorily that it is in the rules. Therefore, it is to be considered a house rule if you want them to have such proficiency. All that I'm hearing from Mistwell is an attempt to prove that the word "special" in the orcblood description is not equated to "magical" but is equated to any item with orc in the name, when there is *no* other mention of special orcblood, or any other raceblood for that matter, considerations given anywhere else *except* for in descriptions of magical weapons/items. It is a weak premise, in my mind.

If you want to do it in your game, be my guest. I'm even considering it as a possibility, making some weapons culturally (not necessarily racially) ingrained. I don't think any of the others here are going to make an attempt to stop you from doing whatever you want to do, unless what you want to do is prove that it is in the books. Because it's not.
 

Remove ads

Top