I'm looking at an article titled "Top 35 Really Bad Movies That Are Ridiculously Fun To Watch"...
How the hell does
Excalibur qualify as a "Really Bad Movie"???
This is the caption they had for it...
Excalibur (1981)
Fun fact about this movie: Liam Neeson and Patrick Stewart acted in it. However, that didn’t save it from being a complete disaster given their flamboyant acting and the crazy story they told to the public. Now, this has become a movie to watch if you want to laugh out of cringe or spend an afternoon learning how you shouldn’t make a film.
...Seriously?
It's the mythical story of King Arthur, and they're complaining about "flamboyant acting" and "crazy story"?
I have no idea what their criteria for "really bad" was, but it seems to pretty much just be spouting random crap about a lot of fairly popular movies, since their list includes
The Greatest Showman,
Meet Joe Black, and
Armageddon (they complain about an unrealistic plot)...