Harassment Policies: New Allegations Show More Work To Be Done

Status
Not open for further replies.
The specter of sexual harassment has once again risen up in tabletop gaming circles. Conventions are supposed to be places where gamers and geeks can be themselves and embrace their loves. Conventions need clear and well formulated harassment policies, and they need to enforce them. In this instance the allegations from multiple women have taken place at gaming conventions and gathering in different locations around the country. In one case, the harassment was took place over the course of years and spilled over into electronic formats.


The alleged harasser in these cases was Sean Patrick Fannon, President of Evil Beagle Games, Brand Manager for Savage Rifts at Pinnacle Entertainment Group, as well as being a game designer and developer with a long history in the tabletop role-playing industry.

There is a long and untenable policy of harassment at conventions that stretches back to science fiction and fantasy fandom in the 1960s. Atlanta's Dragon*Con has been a lightning rod in the discussions about safety at geeky conventions after one of the convention's founders was arrested and pled guilty to three charges of molestation. We have also covered reports of harassment at conventions such as Paizo Con, and inappropriate or harassing behavior by notable industry figures. It is clear that clear harassment policies and firm enforcement of them is needed in spaces where members of our community gather, in order that attendees feel safe to go about their hobby. Some companies, such as Pelgrane Press, now refuse to attend conventions where a clear harassment policy is not available.

Several women have approached me to tell me about encounters with Fannon. Some of them asked not to be named, or to use their reports for background verification only. We also reached out to Sean Patrick Fannon for his comments, and he was willing to address the allegations.

The women that I spoke with had encounters with Fannon that went back to 2013 and 2014 but also happened as recently as the summer of 2017. Each of the locations were in different parts of the country, but all of them occurred when Fannon was a guest of the event.

The worse of the two incidents related to me happened at a convention in the Eastern part of the United States. In going back over texts and messages stretching back years the woman said that it "is frustrating [now] to read these things" because of the cajoling and almost bullying approach that Fannon would use in the messages. She said that Fannon approached her at the con suite of the convention, and after speaking with her for a bit and playing a game with a group in the suite he showed her explicit photos on his cellphone of him engaged in sex acts with a woman.

Fannon's ongoing harassment of this woman would occur both electronically and in person, when they would both be at the same event, and over the course of years he would continue to suggest that she should engage in sexual acts, either with him alone, or with another woman.

Fannon denies the nature of the event, saying "I will assert with confidence that at no time would such a sharing have occurred without my understanding explicit consent on the part of all parties. It may be that, somehow, a miscommunication or misunderstanding occurred; the chaos of a party or social gathering may have created a circumstance of all parties not understanding the same thing within such a discourse. Regardless, I would not have opened such a file and shared it without believing, sincerely, it was a welcome part of the discussion (and in pursuit of further, mutually-expressed intimate interest)."

The second woman, at a different gaming-related event in another part of the country, told of how Fannon, over the course of a day at the event, asked her on four different occasions for hugs, or physical contact with her. Each time she clearly said no to him. The first time she qualified her answer with a "I don't even know you," which prompted Fannon after he saw her for a second time to say "Well, you know me now." She said that because of the multiple attempts in a short period of time that Fannon's behavior felt predatory to her. Afterwards he also attempted to connect with her via Facebook.

Afterwards, this second woman contacted the group that organized the event to share what happened and they reached out to Fannon with their concerns towards his behavior. According to sources within the organization at the time, Fannon - as with the first example - described it to the organizers as a misunderstanding on the woman's part. When asked, he later clarified to us that the misunderstanding was on his own side, saying "Honestly, I should have gotten over myself right at the start, simply owned that I misunderstood, and apologized. In the end, that's what happened, and I walked away from that with a pretty profound sense of how to go forward with my thinking about the personal space of those I don't know or know only in passing."

Both women faced ongoing pressure from Fannon, with one woman the experiences going on for a number of years after the initial convention meeting. In both cases he attempted to continue contact via electronic means with varying degrees of success. A number of screen shots from electronic conversations with Fannon were shared with me by both women.

Diane Bulkeley was willing to come forward and speak on the record of her incidents with Fannon. Fannon made seemingly innocent, and yet inappropriate comments about her body and what he wanted to do with her. She is part of a charity organization that had Fannon as a guest. What happened to her was witnessed by another woman with whom I spoke about that weekend. As Bulkeley heard some things, and her witness others, their experiences are interwoven to describe what happened. Bulkeley described this first encounter at the hotel's elevators: "We were on the floor where our rooms were to go downstairs to the convention floor. I was wearing a tank top and shirt over it that showed my cleavage. He was staring at my chest and said how much he loved my shirt and that I should wear it more often as it makes him hot. For the record I can't help my cleavage is there." Bulkeley went on to describe her mental state towards this "Paying a lady a compliment is one thing, but when you make a direct comment about their chest we have a problem."

Later on in the same day, while unloading some boxes for the convention there was another incident with Fannon. Bulkeley described this: "Well, [the witness and her husband] had to move their stuff from a friends airplane hangar (we all use as storage for cars and stuff) to a storage until next to their house. Apparently Sean, while at the hanger, made grunt noises about my tank top (it was 80 outside) while Tammy was in the truck. I did not see it. But she told me about it. Then as we were unloading the truck at the new facility Sean kept looking down my shirt and saying I have a great view etc. Her husband said to him to knock it off. I rolled my eyes, gave him a glare and continued to work. I did go and put on my event day jacket (light weight jacket) to cover up a little."

The witness, who was in the truck with Fannon, said that he "kept leering down at Diane, glancing down her shirt and making suggestive sounds." The witness said that Fannon commented "'I'm liking the view from up here.'"

Bulkeley talked about how Fannon continued his behavior later on in a restaurant, having dinner with some of the guests of the event. Fannon made inappropriate comments about her body and embarrassed her in front of the other, making her feel uncomfortable throughout the dinner.

Bulkeley said that Fannon also at one point touched her hair without asking, and smelled it as well. "[Fannon] even would smell my long hair. He begged me to not cut it off at a charity function that was part of the weekend's event." She said that he also pressed his pelvis tightly against her body while hugging her. These incidents occurred at a convention during the summer of 2017.

Fannon denies these events. "The comments and actions attributed to me simply did not happen; I categorically and absolutely deny them in their entirety."

When asked for comment, and being informed that this story was being compiled Fannon commented "I do not recall any such circumstance in which the aftermath included a discourse whereby I was informed of distress, anger, or discomfort." He went on to say "The only time I recall having ever been counseled or otherwise spoken to about my behavior in such matters is the Gamers Giving/Total Escape Games situation discussed above. The leader of the organization at that time spoke to me specifically, asked me to be aware that it had been an issue, and requested I be aware of it in the future. It was then formally dropped, and that was the end of it until this time."

There were further reports; however, we have respected the wishes of those women who asked to remain anonymous for fear of online harassment. In researching this article, I talked to multiple women and other witnesses.

About future actions against the alleged behaviors he also said "It is easy, after all, to directly attack and excise obviously predatory and harassing behavior. It is much more difficult to point out and correct behavior that falls within more subtle presentations, and it's more difficult to get folks to see their actions as harmful when they had no intention to cause harm, based on their assumptions of what is and isn't appropriate. It's good for us to look at the core assumptions that lead to those behaviors and continue to challenge them. That's how real and lasting change within society is achieved."

Fannon's weekly column will no longer be running on E.N. World.

Have you suffered harassment at the hands of someone, industry insider or otherwise, at a gaming convention? If you would like to tell your story, you can reach out to me via social media about any alleged incidents. We can speak confidentially, but I will have to know the identity of anyone that I speak with.

This does open up the question of: At what point do conventions become responsible for the actions of their guest, when they are not more closely scrutinizing the backgrounds of those guests? One woman, who is a convention organizer, with whom I spoke for the background of this story told me that word gets around, in the world of comic conventions, when guests and creators cause problems. Apparently this is not yet the case in the world of tabletop role-playing game conventions, because there are a growing number of publishers and designers who have been outed for various types of harassing behavior, but are still being invited to be guest, and in some cases even guests of honor, at gaming conventions around the country. The message that this sends to women who game is pretty clear.

More conventions are rolling out harassment policies for guests and attendees of their conventions. Not only does this help to protect attendees from bad behavior, but it can also help to protect conventions from bad actors within the various communities that gather at our conventions. As incidents of physical and sexual harassment are becoming more visible, it becomes more and more clear that something needs to be done.

additional editorial contributions by Morrus
 

log in or register to remove this ad

But, that wouldn't prove anything. Correlation does not mean causation. After all, it's entirely possible that Alpha con doesn't necessarily actually have anyone going who would harass anyone. Additionally, those that might be harassed, might avoid Alpha con specifically because it allows alcohol, resulting in lower rates of harassment.

After all, harassment occurs very often at work places. Yet, there is (most likely) no alcohol being consumed during work hours. If your point was actually true, then there should be little to no harassment occurring in work places.

The issue isn't drinking, or cosplay girls being scantily dressed, or booth babes, or anything like that. After all, those being harassed are often not any of those things.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


But, that wouldn't prove anything. Correlation does not mean causation. After all, it's entirely possible that Alpha con doesn't necessarily actually have anyone going who would harass anyone. Additionally, those that might be harassed, might avoid Alpha con specifically because it allows alcohol, resulting in lower rates of harassment.

And don't confuse the rate of harassment with the reported rate of harassment.

The issue isn't drinking, or cosplay girls being scantily dressed, or booth babes, or anything like that. After all, those being harassed are often not any of those things.

Fires are not *caused by* a lack of water pipes in the ceiling, but I'm going to guess you require the con hotel to have a sprinkler system. "Fire suppression systems," they are called.

No, alcohol is not the root cause of harassment. But, alcohol is very well known for its tendency to relieve people of their inhibitions - so that pretty much any stupid or negative behavior becomes more common when people have consumed alcohol. If you're a guy who can't be a gentleman when drunk, you lose your right to party.

Restricting alcohol can be seen as, "harassment suppression." It doesn't need to be perfect - it just needs to reduce the frequency and/or severity of issues.
 

And don't confuse the rate of harassment with the reported rate of harassment.



Fires are not *caused by* a lack of water pipes in the ceiling, but I'm going to guess you require the con hotel to have a sprinkler system. "Fire suppression systems," they are called.

No, alcohol is not the root cause of harassment. But, alcohol is very well known for its tendency to relieve people of their inhibitions - so that pretty much any stupid or negative behavior becomes more common when people have consumed alcohol. If you're a guy who can't be a gentleman when drunk, you lose your right to party.

Restricting alcohol can be seen as, "harassment suppression." It doesn't need to be perfect - it just needs to reduce the frequency and/or severity of issues.

That, and as I recall, alcohol was the problem with whats-his-bucket from Frog God Games. Sorry I'm terrible with names.

And at least one of the specific recounted stories by posters in this thread that named names was about someone with a similar problem.

And again there is plenty of non-convention based statistics that indicate rates of harassment (and other bad behaviour) increase dramatically in places where alcohol is served, and among alcoholics.

So drawing a correlation between alcohol and harassment is not a hard one.

It comes down to this: what do people go to nerdy conventions for?
Liquor? Or nerdy stuff?
I'm going to assume its the latter, and that there are likely a multitude of venues for liquor outside of the convention. So what, exactly, is lost if we were to remove alcohol from the equation? The ability to get drunk while at a con? Hardly a loss in my book.
 

How many con's are serving alcohol at the con though? In my experience, they don't exactly have bars serving in the con itself. It's people either bringing alcohol, or going somewhere else and drinking - possibly the hotel bar, for example.

So, does that mean we cannot actually have con's at hotels? Or anywhere else where liquor is available? How is that even possible? The example you cite, of what's his face from Frog God Games, wasn't drinking at the con, according to the story. It was after hours at the hotel bar. Never minding parties in hotel rooms or anything else like that.

I get the idea, but, I'm not sure how practical it actually is.

Granted, you could easily have policies on site where anyone who is noticeably intoxicated is removed. I'm not sure how effective that would be, but, it might help.
 

How many con's are serving alcohol at the con though? In my experience, they don't exactly have bars serving in the con itself.

Here in England they definitely do.
OTOH I don't think I've ever seen a report of harassment from a convention here. So maybe US conventions need different rules for a different culture. :erm:
 



How many con's are serving alcohol at the con though?

The convention doesn't need to serve alcohol itself for alcohol to be part of the problem. Many conventions have the concept of the "room party" - where convention goers hold parties (with or without alcohol). These are sometimes used to promote things (like WorldCon bids), but often just for teh sake of having parties. Often with alcohol. Sometimes with lots of alcohol. Usually, the con has a designation for the "party floor" of the hotel (with the expectation that if you are on the party floor, it is going to be loud late into the night), and those having parties can advertise on the flyer boards around the con, or with tickets that are handed out (or stacks of tickets are often left in elevator lobbies.

"Barfleet" is an organization that's into two things - Star Trek cosplay, and throwing parties with lots of alcohol. At one convention some years back, they had so much alcohol, and so many alcohol problems, that the nearest hospital had to inform the convention that they could take no more of the alcohol poisoning cases they were generating.

So, yeah, alcohol gets served at cons, even if not *by* the con.

So, does that mean we cannot actually have con's at hotels? Or anywhere else where liquor is available? How is that even possible? The example you cite, of what's his face from Frog God Games, wasn't drinking at the con, according to the story. It was after hours at the hotel bar. Never minding parties in hotel rooms or anything else like that.

Reducing *convenient* access is probably effective.

If a convention has an alcohol problem, eliminating the room party (by simple expedient of not having a "party floor", such that all noise complaints would alert the hotel and convention to crack down on them), would go a long way in reducing the drunkenness at most conventions.

And, as you noted, conventions have policies. If you can have an anti-harassment policy, you can also have an anti-drunkeness policy. Get caught obviously drunk in public spaces of the con, lose your badge - at many cons that means you lose access to convention features - no panels, no dealer's room, no convention activities, and it is easy enough to implement. If the con security staff gets called on you drunk, and *thwip*, there it goes!

It wouldn't stop people from getting drunk in small numbers in their own rooms, but it would reduce the number of incidents in the public areas.
 

OTOH I don't think I've ever seen a report of harassment from a convention here.

Why would you expect to? Do you think your favorite cons are going to hunt you down, and tell you straight up the number of harassment incidents they had last year? Have you ever looked for reports on harassment? Are you the person women who were harassed at the con would turn to to talk about it?

This is one of the oldest defensive points for men. "*I* didn't see it or know about it therefore it must hot happen!" Because your personal experience counts as data? A great many things go on in the world that you are not personally aware of.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Status
Not open for further replies.

Related Articles

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top