Sadly, both of those are distinctly political arguments in the sense that they indicate alignment with specific political groups and ideas, and political interpretations of religion and biology. The biological argument is especially incorrect - there have never been just two biological genders, and about 5% of people (more people than are blonde) have sex chromosome abnormalities which they mostly don’t know about but would bar them from being just XX or XY.Ok, since you asked so nicely and without obvious sarcasm. You must lead a really insular life if you have never heard someone make a religious argument on the topic (and no, religion isn't inherently political). I personally know someone who is anti-trans and makes what he feels are scientific arguments based on the remarks of a well known evolutionary biologist, Richard Dawkins. Neither are political arguments, which is not the same as saying they may have political ramifications.
And once again, I don't buy into their positions and I am not anti-trans. However, this conversation is going nowhere so I am bowing out.
I suppose that means that the biological and scientific arguments for trans people are also political, but I guess that’s where we are now.







