Desdichado
Legend
Uh, yeah, in the book it was a big moment. Huge, even. It was just a very weak big moment.Crothian said:Ah, you are assuming it is supposed to be this big moment...in the book it wasn't a big moment so I don't consider it one.
Uh, yeah, in the book it was a big moment. Huge, even. It was just a very weak big moment.Crothian said:Ah, you are assuming it is supposed to be this big moment...in the book it wasn't a big moment so I don't consider it one.
Joshua Dyal said:Uh, yeah, in the book it was a big moment. Huge, even. It was just a very weak big moment.
The past films coasted on the popularity of the source material. They weren't really very good movies in their own right. And the formula was demonstrably not that successful; the takes of the movies was down nearly $100 million between 1 and 3.Steel_Wind said:But Goblet of Fire didn't do it for me and broke far too much with the successful formula of the past films.
On what are you basing that claim? This movie, more than the past ones, was self-contained, in my opinion--depending less on what the viewer supposedly already knew to coast through the plot. And I certainly haven't seen any indication of any dividing line as you describe. If you want to make claims like that, find something to back them up! Critical reviews and user reviews on sites like Yahoo! and whatnot lean exactly the opposite way; folks in general are liking this movie the best of all the Harry Potter movies to date, regardless of whether or not they've seen the movie, for the most part.Steel_Wind said:And I do think that there seems to be a dividing line over those who really liked Goblet of Fire and those who did not. If you read the books - you liked the film. Mainly, I think it's because that knowledge from the book is filling in the huge gaps in the movie.
They're not "dumping" him, he stepped down. On a high note, in my opinion, since he really got his feel for the HP movies after the lackluster "lighter" scripts he wrote for the first two books. And since the new selected screenwriter has had a string of poorly viewed screenplays under his belt, with only one real "hit", I'm skeptical.Steel-Wind said:If they are dumping the current writer to get a better adapatation for Order of the Phoenix - good for them. He may have been great at working out lighter material but the last movie was not up to par with the first three films.
No doubt. You've made your disdain for every aspect of the new movie abundantly clear in several threads now. Don't look for him to come back anytime soon, though--just the opening weekend take for 4 was almost half of the entire run of 3.Steel_Wind said:I'd rather they went back to the director of Prisoner of Azkaban too.
Steel_Wind said:It may have been "fine" to you but I found that it lacked the magic of the first three and it was too rushed.
I was disappointed in Goblet of Fire, I really was. Rather reluctantly and hesitantly I have become a fan of the movie series. I have never read the books, although my wife and kids have.
But Goblet of Fire didn't do it for me and broke far too much with the successful formula of the past films.
And I do think that there seems to be a dividing line over those who really liked Goblet of Fire and those who did not. If you read the books - you liked the film. Mainly, I think it's because that knowledge from the book is filling in the huge gaps in the movie.
If they are dumping the current writer to get a better adapatation for Order of the Phoenix - good for them. He may have been great at working out lighter material but the last movie was not up to par with the first three films.
I'd rather they went back to the director of Prisoner of Azkaban too.
Exactly my point, I think.Crothian said:I don't think it was a big moment in the book. I think JK wanted it to be a big moment, but it didn't come off that way at all.
Crothian said:I don't think it was a big moment in the book. I think JK wanted it to be a big moment, but it didn't come off that way at all.
David Howery said:they should be making these movies like they did for LOTR... film lots of scenes, cut the theatrical film down to the basics, put the extra scenes back in for a 'special edition' release....
Crothian said:I think JK wanted it to be a big moment, but it didn't come off that way at all.
Umbran said:I don't think she intended it to be a big moment, in the standard sense of the word, and I think that's part of the point - important things often happen in anticlimatic ways.
The thing is that if it had been a "big moment" there'd be more conclusion to it, a more solid feeling that Sirius was gone. But she wants Harry to lack that closure.