Sejs said:
Question -
Do you have a problem with psionics?
Particularly the psychic warrior class, both in conception and execution.
Because under the ki/psionics-are-the-same transparancy, martial initiates are doing the exact same thing. They're physical adepts. Channeling magic in a particular way to enhance their fighting.
No, because psionics has an explanation that makes sense in the setting. I.e. if you include psionics, it works off psionic energy.
Whereas Bo9S basically says, "Wouldn't it be cool if fighters could go all Matrix?"
The fireball argument is just not relevant. A fireball is a spell. The whole problem with maneuvers is that they exist in a world of spells, but are not themselves spells, although they sure look like them sometime. Does something like a Spellsword even make sense in a world of warblades and crusaders? Does a
wizard even make sense when someone can learn to use supernatural powers to be almost as destructive, while also gaining great physical prowess?
I'm just not into Street Fighter: Underdark edition as my D&D. I'm fine with Bo9S for what it is, but to me it's something I can imagine a third party coming out with as their own d20 offering, not something I think should be added to D&D.
And it's not a great book. It's named after nine weapons which use rules from another book which is just about the worst product in D&D. The style is poor man's Exalted. The design is about on par with the 3.0 psionics handbook. Balance is in the neighborhood of Masters of the Wild. The milieu has no place in a conventional Greyhawk or Forgotten Realms or Krynn or Mystara. The Knights of Solamnia and Neraka, for instance, do not know kung fu.