Scribe
Legend
Oh, then I misunderstood you, and yes I agree it integrates fine, and I'm sure 5.5 or whatever will as well.I was discussing integration. It integrated fine. Seamlessly
Oh, then I misunderstood you, and yes I agree it integrates fine, and I'm sure 5.5 or whatever will as well.I was discussing integration. It integrated fine. Seamlessly
For real.I thought I would have a rogue comet impact the greater Seattle area.
The serious answer is that I don't plan endings as it is fully dependent on how much the group and I like what comes next. We played 3.5 all the way through 4e and into 2019 before 5e had enough product for us to make the switch. 3 years later we still debate whether the next campaign is going back to 3e or sticking with 5e.
Right there with you. The only real utility I'm going to get out of the new edition is bits and pieces for my homebrew.For real.
We played 1e through 1999 when I had to play - half orc Paladin in 3.0.
(Skipped 2e entirely)
Skipped 3.5. ONE SESSION of 4e….so skipped it too.
We are pretty happy with 5e…5.5 will have to be pretty darn great to cause a switch.
I don’t have to be in the cult of the new if I am having fun. And with what is happening with art direction and lore I am thinking my group will stick with 5e.
We all play and DM and have lots of books…you never know. But more likely is stealing some new stuff and dropping it into 5e (feats at one, a few fixes whatever)
It’s all fine.Right there with you. The only real utility I'm going to get out of the new edition is bits and pieces for my homebrew.
I'm not sure how well that would work - the subclass features don't show u p at the same level in the old vs the new phb.Probably only in places like this. In the larger community, it’ll just be “oh hey the revised core books are out” or “oh snap they updated the core books. Nah, you can still make characters using Xanathar’s and Tasha’s and the Eberron book. Issa patch, it’s not that serious.”
If I can, without “conversion”, make a character using the new phb, Xanathar’s, Eberron, and MoTM, it’s not a new edition.
It works fine, right now, in practice.I'm not sure how well that would work - the subclass features don't show u p at the same level in the old vs the new phb.