Hey guys,
I'm fairly new to both the boards here and D&D itself, so I apologize if there is already a thread about this somewhere throughout the forums.
I've been reading through the PHB for v3.5 like a fiend, and I can't seem to come up with a concrete way that spell casting is supposed to follow. I would assume that when you want to cast a spell, detrimental direct damage for example, that you have to make an attack roll, correct? I can't find exactly what that attack roll would be comprised of.
It seems a little over-powered to me that sorcerers, for example, can just go ahead and say they're casting a damaging spell without having to see if the spell hits them first. I know there's spell failure (concentration), spell resistance and save throws against spells, but I can't seem to come up with a formula that describes the attack roll for spells.
Thanks for the help in advance!
--Brian
I'm fairly new to both the boards here and D&D itself, so I apologize if there is already a thread about this somewhere throughout the forums.
I've been reading through the PHB for v3.5 like a fiend, and I can't seem to come up with a concrete way that spell casting is supposed to follow. I would assume that when you want to cast a spell, detrimental direct damage for example, that you have to make an attack roll, correct? I can't find exactly what that attack roll would be comprised of.
It seems a little over-powered to me that sorcerers, for example, can just go ahead and say they're casting a damaging spell without having to see if the spell hits them first. I know there's spell failure (concentration), spell resistance and save throws against spells, but I can't seem to come up with a formula that describes the attack roll for spells.
Thanks for the help in advance!
--Brian