D&D General Homebrew or Premade Campaigns?

[Azzy]

Both

 

[wicked cool]

Combined

 

[el-remmen]

I most often run premade adventures with heavy homebrew modifications. So, both, simultaneously

This is the way.

 

[DrunkonDuty]

Yeah, both.

 

[AlViking]

Homebrew, I run a very open and flexible campaign trying to do that with published materials is more work than doing it myself.

 

[Reynard]

I never ran a published scenario after The Isle of Dread for literally 30+ years. But when I started running games using a VTT (Fantasy Grounds, specifically) I found it easier to use pre-published and converted to FG modules. I ended up hating it. I am back to running homebrew, which honestly means improv and making crap up as I go along.

 

[Remathilis]

I have only run premade for a while now. I gave up on homebrew. It was a lot of extra work do develop a bunch of info no player ever remembered or used. The things that made my games special were characters and stories, and that is what I focus on.

So my last few games have alternated between Eberron and Ravenloft, and it has worked fine for me.

 

[payn]

I most often run premade adventures with heavy homebrew modifications. So, both, simultaneously

 

[sevenbastard]

Homebrew. I get more excited if im running my own stuff.

plus i preffer to run a low magic grimdark sandbox meat grinder, and not many pre-made options for that.

 

[Umbran]

Both.
Sometimes, I run a published campaign.
Sometimes, I heavily modify a published campaign, so it is kind of half homebrew.
Sometimes, I just homebrew.