House of the Dragon spoiler thread

I thought inbreeding was accepted practice for Targaryans, Deamon intimated it was their way and sibling unions seemed to be normal-ish in their lineage.

Sure, if we’re taking Daemon’s word on things. Alicent isn’t Targaryen though, so I can understand her point a view on the matter, like I said above, there are a number of reasons she’s mad about what Rhaenyra did. It’s not just moral judgment, there’s also jealousy, etc.

Pukunui said that Alicent‘s moralising did not compute with him because of the tapestries. I was explaining why I thought it made sense that her character would act that way.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Zardnaar

Legend
I thought inbreeding was accepted practice for Targaryans, Deamon intimated it was their way and sibling unions seemed to be normal-ish in their lineage.

In comparison You’ve got an old king taking his daughters teen companion as a replacement queen in a room hung with erotic tapestries, that seems equally scandalous really - especially with the added scandal of her being pimped out by he father The Hand…

You're judging it with modern values. Nobility often didn't have to much choice in terms of marriages. In some cases the law drastically narrowed down the options.

Valyria is more like the Romans with incest being fine, Westeros not so tolerant of incest.

It's a feudal society but not monotheistic and their pornographic images in the background isn't any worse than what they've found in Pompeii.
 

billd91

Not your screen monkey (he/him)
I thought inbreeding was accepted practice for Targaryans, Deamon intimated it was their way and sibling unions seemed to be normal-ish in their lineage.
It is, and if the show follows the book, there's more to come.

That said, marrying a couple of closely related Targaryans in an incestuous relationship to protect the bloodline is one thing. From Viserys's perspective, your brother having extramarital sex with your unmarried daughter who is supposed to be a virgin bride for whomever you can forge a beneficial political bond with - that's entirely different. And the bitter words between Viserys and Daemon alludes to the differences in expectations in their patriarchal society.
 

Stalker0

Legend
It is, and if the show follows the book, there's more to come.

That said, marrying a couple of closely related Targaryans in an incestuous relationship to protect the bloodline is one thing. From Viserys's perspective, your brother having extramarital sex with your unmarried daughter who is supposed to be a virgin bride for whomever you can forge a beneficial political bond with - that's entirely different. And the bitter words between Viserys and Daemon alludes to the differences in expectations in their patriarchal society.
Yeah the issue is not that Rhenera slept with her uncle, it’s that she slept with anyone.

Ruining her virtue greatly weakens her prospects and is another weapon for her enemies to use to weaken her claim to the throne.

And yes it’s exceedingly unfair, but it’s also exceedingly true.
 


pukunui

Legend
According to actor Paddy Considine, Viserys is suffering from leprosy.

Perhaps it’s just because he’s the king, but I’m surprised Westeros doesn’t isolate lepers from the rest of society like medieval Europeans did.


 
Last edited:

payn

He'll flip ya...Flip ya for real...
According to actor Paddy Considine, Viserys is suffering from leprosy.

Perhaps it’s just because he’s the king, but I’m surprised Westeros doesn’t isolate lepers from the rest of society like medieval Europeans did.


Yeap, that is what I guessed after the episode. I originally thought it was some type of allergic reaction to the iron throne. That would have been more poetic.

I'm guessing they went to lengths to hide it from people because he is the king. Anybody else would have been shipped off.
 

pukunui

Legend
Yeap, that is what I guessed after the episode. I originally thought it was some type of allergic reaction to the iron throne. That would have been more poetic.
Leprosy is a bacterial infection. Medieval hygiene being what it was, Viserys must have had the bacteria on him when he got cut by the throne. (Or the throne has mystically cursed him with it for being unworthy, if we want a more fantastical explanation.)
 

payn

He'll flip ya...Flip ya for real...
Leprosy is a bacterial infection. Medieval hygiene being what it was, Viserys must have had the bacteria on him when he got cut by the throne. (Or the throne has mystically cursed him with it for being unworthy, if we want a more fantastical explanation.)
Im not sure I agree with the unworthy take on King Viserys. Nor the idea he made many mistakes. Perhaps sat on the fence at times he ought to have acted, but he never did anything rash, or terrible, or stupid. My take was more that Viserys was a good man, and thus the throne rejected him for that sin alone.
 

pukunui

Legend
Im not sure I agree with the unworthy take on King Viserys. Nor the idea he made many mistakes. Perhaps sat on the fence at times he ought to have acted, but he never did anything rash, or terrible, or stupid. My take was more that Viserys was a good man, and thus the throne rejected him for that sin alone.
Absolutely! What the throne considers to be unworthy might not be the same as what we would consider to be unworthy.

That being said, I view the whole “the throne rejects the unworthy” thing as a superstition. I don’t think there’s meant to be anything supernatural about the throne in actuality.
 
Last edited:

Remove ads

Top