No sane person would be an adventurer. D&D is a game about insane adventurers. They're looking for the story. The general advice of "please make an adventurer" comes to mind, i.e. please make a D&D character that's going to engage with the things D&D is about.
Don't eat the Dwarf.That's why we have a fighter, duh.
The reason we don't let him do anything but attack is to keep him tender.Don't eat the Dwarf.
No sane person would go into a dungeon. No sane person would fight a dragon. Yet that's exactly what the game is about. So clearly your average D&D character isn't a sane person.And let's not forget to think from the in-universe character's point of view: No sane person will take the dangerous maze!
You shouldn't talk about extreme sports if you're going to attack extreme sports people like that. Firefighters, police, military people. They all seem to really rather enjoy risking their lives and doing all those extreme things. D&D characters are those kinds of people. They're not armchair quarterbacks...that's literally us as players. Playing a character who's hyper-cautious is playing a character that's basically a player stand-in. PCs are adrenaline junkie who're out scouring dungeons and fighting dragons for a living. They are the D&D equivalent to extreme sports people, firefighters, police, and military. It's literally their job. That they chose to do. Instead of staying home where it's safe and warm. They choose to train up, invest in the gear, and go delve dungeons. Playing them as hyper-cautious literally goes against their character and the game's assumptions.It might be fun for the PLAYER but the CHARACTER isn't gonna have a good time fighting for their life!!
Don't confuse your survival instinct with your characters and you'll have a lot more fun.You shouldn't have to actively fight against your character's survival instinct to have fun!
Right. So the characters live in a world were healing is cheap and plentiful. They should be less risk adverse, not more.And 5e let's you dump gold straight into HP with potions![]()
ideally these people aren't risking their lives for 'enjoyment'.Firefighters, police, military people. They all seem to really rather enjoy risking their lives and doing all those extreme things.
Look at a cross-section of their hobbies some time. The vast majority are adrenaline junkies.ideally these people aren't risking their lives for 'enjoyment'.
Define sane. People will take fairly serious risks for money or to defend their families - and we don't claim that no sane person would ever e.g. become a soldier.No sane person would go into a dungeon. No sane person would fight a dragon.
That's a ridiculous point. Firefighters train to minize risks. They don't rush into a burning building through the hardest way in for FUN! They go through the most efficient and safest route possible to save lives!You shouldn't talk about extreme sports if you're going to attack extreme sports people like that. Firefighters, police, military people. They all seem to really rather enjoy risking their lives and doing all those extreme things.
You're mixing up two different things. Yes, they train to minimize risk on the job...and their hobbies are typically quite extreme. So for a lot of them, it's fun to feel the adrenaline rush of extreme sports. And training to survive running into a burning building doesn't preclude the adrenaline rush they get from running into a burning building. Just because they're trained to minimize risk on the job doesn't mean it's not also fun or that they don't take risks for the fun of it. Both are simultaneously true: they minimize risks on the job and take risks because they're fun on and off the job.That's a ridiculous point. Firefighters train to minize risks. They don't rush into a burning building through the hardest way in for FUN! They go through the most efficient and safest route possible to save lives!
Not enough to avoid intentionally running into a building that's on fire.Firefighters still value their own lives and they still have to evaluate risk all the time.
They're also legally required to. Take a look at YouTube and all the dumb crap people get up to without safety gear. Jackass is a famous example. Extreme sports have sponsors and insurance to worry about.Extreme sports enthusiasts still wear protective gear JUST IN CASE.
You seem to be confusing things a bit. Risking your life is inherent in extreme sports. They wear protective gear to minimize accidents and because they're legally required to. But death is always a possibility. Bungee jumping, base jumping, skydiving, etc. And yes, the extreme sports people wear protective gear...kinda like how adventurers wear armor...but they still willingly, regularly, and intentionally risk their lives for fun and profit. Now. Take away the insurance companies and sponsors. What would extreme sports look like? A lot closer to Jackass and the folks on YouTube. And D&D adventurers.So yeah. If those tools are available IN-UNIVERSE and your character is aware of them? NOT using them would be a stupid decision on their part. Do your characters go into dark caves without a source of light because it's more fun?! No! They grab ask the Wizard to use his Light cantrip, or they grab a lantern, a torch or even a candle. If they have a Bag of Holding you better believe they'll stuff it full of rations, water and ammunition, even if you think micromanaging that stuff is more fun.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.