D&D 5E How to "fix" (or at least help) the fighter/wizard dynamic. (+)

[Tales and Chronicles]

Re: Attunement.

Maybe put have the fighters gain the same feature as the armorer artificer at level 6 ish where they gain extra attunement slots if the equipment is part of an armor. Say magic helms, armors, boots and gloves can all be attuned on the same ''slot'' and do not count as one each.

And maybe a side note saying that if your DM gives you downtime activities, you reduce the time and cost of creating and buying a mundane or magic armors and equipment, giving +PB to the roll to see what was created/bought or whatever.

And for the lol, have Wizard gain only one new auto-spell at level up, which must be one from their favored school. And, yeah, bring back opposite schools, making it impossible for wizard to cast spells of their opposite school beyond 2nd level or so.

 

[Umbran]

God I hate these threads.

Mod Note:
If you dislike them so much, don't read or join in on them. This one is specifically labelled as being a (+) thread - only intended for those who are, in fact, in general agreement on the premise.

Here, let me help you by relieving you of the need to respond to this discussion further.

 

[Vaalingrade]

Funny how when people say there isn't a problem they get a response that it's a "+" thread. When people just complain about fighters being broken without offering any suggestions, crickets.

Just an observation.

I know. It's real strange that 'Shut up' isn't something people accept as a solution to a problem they're seeing.

 

[Oofta]

I know. It's real strange that 'Shut up' isn't something people accept as a solution to a problem they're seeing.

My comment was that if people say "it's broken" and don't offer anything else nobody says a thing. Say "it works for me, I don't see a problem" and they're told to shut up.

It's a double standard.

 

[Umbran]

Just an observation.

Mod Note:
At this point, you're not observing - you are threadcrapping on the very premise of a (+) thread.

Time for you to leave this conversation, too.

 

[Umbran]

It's a double standard.

Yep! That is, in fact, the purpose of a (+) thread - to align discussion in favor of some premise. It does, in fact, has slightly different standards than threads as a whole - if it didn't, it wouldn't have a separate designation.

Kind of a no-brainer, really.

 

[FrogReaver]

Also inappropriate for a (+) thread. Thank you for nothing. Ignore.

Not sure I understand. I didn’t dispute the premise. I agree with it.

 

[DND_Reborn]

Not sure I understand. I didn’t dispute the premise. I agree with it.

That was for Flamestrike, not you. Did I get the wrong person???

The post you quoted was for Flamestrike, even. I am confused.

Given your post here:

One thing I keep seeing is that fighters are better at damage than wizards. And while that’s certainly true in tier 1, and maybe early tier 2, eventually wizards start to be strong at single target damage. Tashas summoning spells, polymorph, animate objects, crown of stars, foresight. And they already are better at damage in most multi target situations, fireball.

It seems like you agree with it.

 

[FrogReaver]

That was for Flamestrike, not you. Did I get the wrong person???

The post you quoted was for Flamestrike, even. I am confused.

Given your post here:

It seems like you agree with it.

Ah, I think he has me blocked. So on my screen your comment appeared right below mine and there was no quote or reference to anything he said. Sorry for the confusion.

 

[DND_Reborn]

Ah, I think he has me blocked. So on my screen your comment appeared right below mine and there was no quote or reference to anything he said. Sorry for the confusion.

No worries!