Huge Cover Images from CNET article
Wolfspider
Explorer
That red dragon has horn piercings.
Interesting.
Interesting.
GnomeWorks
Adventurer
Anybody else notice that the names on each of the books are different?
Wonder what that's about.
Wonder what that's about.
Fallen Seraph
First Post
GnomeWorks said:
That different people worked on different books?
HeavenShallBurn
First Post
1.) At least the red dragon doesn't have nipple rings
2.) I think of them all the Monster Manual cover is the best. A bit more comic bookish styling than I'd prefer but it's pretty much how I always envisioned Orcus (Although FC1 had the best Orcus pic ever IMO). I've always stated the Demon Lords as Gargantuan creatures.
3.) The head still looks a bit off on the dragonborn, thought it may be perspective. And it definitely needs a tail, without the tail reptilian humanoids just don't look right.
2.) I think of them all the Monster Manual cover is the best. A bit more comic bookish styling than I'd prefer but it's pretty much how I always envisioned Orcus (Although FC1 had the best Orcus pic ever IMO). I've always stated the Demon Lords as Gargantuan creatures.
3.) The head still looks a bit off on the dragonborn, thought it may be perspective. And it definitely needs a tail, without the tail reptilian humanoids just don't look right.
Boarstorm
First Post
Interesting. Notice the subheader on the PHB?
"Arcane, Divine and Martial Heroes"
Does this mean that the PHB2 and 3 and 17 will be fully developed player's manuals instead of a few new classes and some optional rules like the 3.5 PHB2? As in, could I say, play a sorcerer from the PHB2 without ever needing to pick up the PHB?
"Arcane, Divine and Martial Heroes"
Does this mean that the PHB2 and 3 and 17 will be fully developed player's manuals instead of a few new classes and some optional rules like the 3.5 PHB2? As in, could I say, play a sorcerer from the PHB2 without ever needing to pick up the PHB?
GnomeWorks
Adventurer
Fallen Seraph said:
Aside from that. I mean, didn't all the 3.5 books have the same names on them? I don't have them handy to check... but it seems sort of awkward.
Like - Mearls' name is only on the MM, and not on the PH. That seems a little strange to me, because I guess I've been under the impression that he's put some work into the PH.
Pale Jackal
First Post
With the bigger pictures, I like the PHB and MM a lot more, but the DMG (which I liked a lot) a bit less.
Still think the Dragonborn looks kinda dumb, but the MM cover looks a lot better than I was expecting, wish the skull wasn't green, though.
Still think the Dragonborn looks kinda dumb, but the MM cover looks a lot better than I was expecting, wish the skull wasn't green, though.
Fallen Seraph
First Post
GnomeWorks said:
Aside from that. I mean, didn't all the 3.5 books have the same names on them? I don't have them handy to check... but it seems sort of awkward.
Like - Mearls' name is only on the MM, and not on the PH. That seems a little strange to me, because I guess I've been under the impression that he's put some work into the PH.
I imagine they probably list the Key-Designers or Heads of Design for that book, while others be listed inside the book.
