(humor) Ok ... in D&D 3.5, who wins, the Commoner or the Housecat?

[Edena_of_Neith]

I remember the pages of debate on who would win in Dungeons and Dragons 3.0, the Commoner (armed and armored) or the Housecat.
But now, in Dungeons and Dragons 3.5, they have changed the combat rules, and apparently many other rules as well.

So who would win in this new 3.5 system?
The Commoner, armed and armored?
Or the Housecat?

 

[DerianCypher]

The housecat must still win! otherwise why on earth would the commoners not go on a rampage and slaughter them all? I mean, how would you feel if you'd been kept under the vicous paw of a mighty cat empire for years and suddenly you would fare better in a fight?

WoTC must have kept it the same or else the entire world would be turned upside down



DC

 

[Edena_of_Neith]

Well, I WOULD note that catlords abound in D&D, and cats seem to have all sorts of special attributes.

 

[Impeesa]

Yeah - you don't see any commoner-lords walking around, right? It stands to reason the catlords have killed them all.

--Impeesa--

 

[DerianCypher]

Exactly,

for the good of the universe, the catlords must remain in power.

DC

 

[Dr. Strangemonkey]

My cat beats me up.

I live in fear...

 

[DerianCypher]

Your fear is for the good of the universe..

...this is why dogs are better

DC

 

[Imperialus]

well I'm sure once you got a few levels in Commoner you could probably swing that shovel pretty hard....

 

[s/LaSH]

Has anyone here ever beaten a cat in a fight? With the aid of modern technology and training? If not, then how could a malnutrated commoner who's never seen a Bruce Lee movie do it?

Cats is vicious.

Dogs, on the other hand, are pushovers.

 

[Taloras]

Aww...cats are pushovers if you get them at the right time. Such as that 16 hours of the day they sleep (night is their waking time)