Your stated position was:
The bolded bits are what, personally, I find to be ridiculous.
Not preferring that that they do, which I also prefer, but saying that if they want to be a publisher, they essentially must put out extra material for every single RPG they publish. The reality is a lot of really good RPGs have had very little or no support, and are still really good RPGs.
Also, and you don't say this, but it's implied, it seems like you might be assuming they're going to do the same with Daggerheart, and I don't think that's a logical assumption personally, unless Darrington said they were going to put out a ton of stuff for CO, and then just didn't (wait, did they?). One suspects that if Daggerheart is successful they'll actually be pretty keen to sell sourcebooks and adventures and card packs for it. Especially those high-cost high-margin card packs.
Me too! But I accept this is because I am a lazy so-and-so sometimes, and I don't think it's like, an intrinsic and nigh-required part of publishing RPGs.