I do want 5E (and 6E, and 7E...)

OTOH, I'm pretty happy with a never ending treadmill of editions.

Game designers are pretty smart people and they keep coming up with cool new ideas. Some of those ideas don't play well with existing ideas, so, we get a new edition.

And that's groovy.

I guess everyone has different preferences. But the never-ending treadmill of editions (with major changes between each edition) is what made me drop D&D from my list of games to play. By all means fix parts of the game that need fixing, but don't restructure or retool the game. I mean if I wanted a different and new game, I have plenty to choose from at the local game store.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

If it's not a significantly different game, then what's the point? I don't need to buy the game all over again to get a few cosmetic updates and house rules. The only reason I'd be interested in a new edition of D&D is if it's an all new game.

[snip]

If you are going to put out a significantly different game, why not give it a significantly different name?
 



I agree with the OP, I hope they continue to put out new editions every 5-7 years for awhile.

I have played every edition of D&D from Holmes Basic on. At some point in the life of every edition, I have stopped playing it out of dissatisfaction. Took longer with some editions, I played 1e AD&D for a good 10 years before I set it aside shortly before 2e ame out. Some trials were briefer, I canceled a 3e campaign after about 6 months and have never used that version since.

The point is, each new version addressed some of the reasons I put aside prior versions, more or less successfully, and each version added some things that became problems for me over time. The core concepts of D&D are very engaging and I want the game to better. Even in it's 6th major pass, the game does not yet feel like it's done.

When an edition is finally released that feels, to me, like they finally got it just right, I will no doubt feel like GregoryOatmeal and want that version to remain perennially in print (whatever "print" is at that point). For now though, I want the designers to keep working on it. The game still aint done.
 



Thing is, I don't. I like playing other games.

But, unlike RogueAttorney above here, I don't see the games as being so different as to be different games. I see them as evolutionary changes as we learn more about what works at the table and what doesn't.

What works and what doesn't is often subjective. For instance, there is a 4e forum there where I see a lot of complaints regarding the 3e skill system and how it was broken. However, for the gamers that I, personally, know it works very well and is preferred to 4e.
 

What works and what doesn't is often subjective. For instance, there is a 4e forum there where I see a lot of complaints regarding the 3e skill system and how it was broken. However, for the gamers that I, personally, know it works very well and is preferred to 4e.

I agree. Each new edition isn't one step closer to perfection. Each one answers different criticisms. 4E adressed concerns about 3E expressed by some gamers. But these concerns were not universally shared.
 


Remove ads

Top