S
Sunseeker
Guest
EVERYTHING in a fantasy game is fantastic to some degree, what angers me about certain magical vs non-magical arguments is the fact that many seem to argue that X cannot be fantastical, AT ALL, while Y must be fantastical at all times.We make allowances for things that are fantastic, yes. But we also have a sense of reality for things that are actually real or closely based on reality so that when they are out of proportion, they jar our senses in ways that our allowance for the fantastic can't always deal with. People may have differing thresholds for this.
I think it is an extension of that argument. People who take issue with "fantastical" non-magical characters tend to be the same ones who call for purposeful imbalance because magic means the rules don't apply.It is most emphatically NOT a case of non-magical characters not getting nice things or even outlandish things. I'll admit that the sense of jarring unreality may feed the preference that non-magical characters not have the same reality bending powers as magic, but the issues are in no way the same thing.
I take issue with the idea that people want to ground their ideas of non-magical folk in reality, but then turn a blind eye when magic is involved. It's disingenuous, hypocritical and IMO damaging to the environment of the game.