Because the important part is choosing/making up background, powers, rituals and skills. And even people who are interested in doing that will want good examples to start from, or use out of the box.Saitou said:WotC undoubtedly has those ranges, but I doubt they'll be providing anything like that to their readers in as many words.
Otherwise, why buy MM books at all?
Saitou said:Also, all of this has been all but said in the many months leading up to 4E. I imagine you are just a bit slow?
Well put! I agree with everything you've said (except for your incorrect usage of the term a prioriUlthwithian said:What is wrong with you people? You make perhaps the most egregious error one can possibly make in rhetoric. You start with the axiom, "I am right," a priori to any discussion. May I humbly suggest that starting with the axiom, "I might not be right," may be more proper?
The fact that Lizard did not raise to the bait thrown at him further enhances his standing, and lowers yours.
the Jester said:I'm pretty sure that WotC has said explicitly that you will have this information.
Lizard said:4e is a point-based system like GURPS or Hero...without the points. At least as far as NPCs are concerned.
...
Once it hit me that, basically, every monster/NPC in 4e is effectively built from scratch, not according to a structured system (other than role/level guidelines), my perspective changed dramatically.