LcKedovan
Explorer
ColonelHardisson said:
This is an excellent point. I've never quite understood how "cowboy" can be used as such a negative. If anything, cowboys are American versions of knights - a lone horseman, equipped for war, riding about the land righting wrongs (or at least that's how cowboys have been portrayed in movies and literature for more than a century). Of course, Native Americans may have a different view of them (and deservedly so), but I would imagine soldiers would be a lot more negative for them (but, if we're lucky, a Native American poster will show up to set me straight). Still, why cowboys are seen so negatively in Europe and beyond is puzzling to me.
Just to maybe clear up this "aspect" of the thread, it's not cowboys that are seen negatively. It is a case from the cold war (or earlier?) where "cowboy diplomacy" was termed. It is not a view on actual cowboys, but if someone is a "cowboy" in this sense it means they are more likely to reach for their gun than solve the problem diplomatically ala. the wild west.
-Will