And... coincidence being what it is.... check out this on moving an asteroid:
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SCI_CAPTURING_ASTEROID?SITE=AP
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SCI_CAPTURING_ASTEROID?SITE=AP
To them, I say: "Don't. Screw. That. Up."
I wonder about the assumption that radio is the point when we find out about each other?
Could the telescopes of the 19th Century have observed the Martian civilization?
Funny thing: greedy immoral people tend to rise to positions of power and influence. What effect does that have on a culture, do you think?
Jdvn1 said:I still think no one has satisfactorily explained why we would attack them - it's not cost-efficient and it doesn't provide us with any benefit.
Only with great difficulty and crippling costs. Which is another way of saying - not realistically. Further, both sides would be further advantaged by trade. Think about how this already doesn't happen on an international level.1. They could do it.
They probably think in a similar manner to how we do - but regardless, that doesn't matter. We'd have a chance to communicate with them first and find out how they think. Which brings me back around to seeing how this already doesn't happen on an international level - diplomacy is typically the first response. It's also the cheapest and most potentially beneficial response. The immediate response of war hurts more than it helps because not only is it costly, it prevents trade and diverts money from more economically efficient enterprises.Derren said:2. We would have absolutely no idea how they think. The most crazy human psycho would be more understandable than an alien.