immortals handbook

Howdy Krust!

I don't want to stray too far off topic (although I think this is somewhat related) but I have a couple more questions re: the IH. I should preface these by saying that I suspect you won;t be able to answer either of these in whole, and that I don't want to spoil any surprises, but I am curious about the following:

1. Will the IH offer any guidance for DMs and/or players roleplaying some of these uber-powerful things that you've come up with. Now it seems that for some of the "lower end" classics (Odin, Hercules, Asmodeus) that there is a sufficient base of knowledge showing that many of these characters acted more less like humans (even children at times), so that a DM or player could readily plug them into a campaign and approximate their behavior with a fair degree of accuracy. However, for some of the REALLY big guys who have nothing close to a human frame of reference and may be orders of magnitude smarter and wiser than any human, it seems like DMs and players could use a helping hand;

2. On a related topic, I was wondering to what extent your higher end beings could be classified (although not necessarily subject to) an alignment. My thinking here is that some of the really big guys would transcend concepts like lawfulness or neutrality.


Thanks in advance, I know that these cut pretty close, but I would be remiss if I didn't pry a bit. :D
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Historian brought up some points I was wondering about the other day. Then I forgot....but yeah. Three more questions for you Oh Krustaceous one:

1) Did you ever make a decision in reference to the inclusion or lack thereof of Huper-Ouranoi? And if the answer's no would you care to divulge the information you have on them?
2) The fact that you have many levels of higher and higher divinities reminds me a bit of my limited knowledge of Gnosticism, was that at all an inspiration to that idea or any other part of your work? Did any other interesting religious ideas (Qabbala, etc.) influence the work?
3) Do our constant questions ever get annoying or frustrating? I mean seriously how can you deal with all the crap we ask you? :D
 

historian said:
Howdy Krust!

Hiya mate! :)

historian said:
I don't want to stray too far off topic (although I think this is somewhat related) but I have a couple more questions re: the IH. I should preface these by saying that I suspect you won't be able to answer either of these in whole, and that I don't want to spoil any surprises, but I am curious about the following:

Fire away.

historian said:
1. Will the IH offer any guidance for DMs and/or players roleplaying some of these uber-powerful things that you've come up with. Now it seems that for some of the "lower end" classics (Odin, Hercules, Asmodeus) that there is a sufficient base of knowledge showing that many of these characters acted more less like humans (even children at times), so that a DM or player could readily plug them into a campaign and approximate their behavior with a fair degree of accuracy. However, for some of the REALLY big guys who have nothing close to a human frame of reference and may be orders of magnitude smarter and wiser than any human, it seems like DMs and players could use a helping hand;

Well, of course I'll try and describe such beings to the best of my ability. As well as providing as much advice on different campaign models as I can.

historian said:
2. On a related topic, I was wondering to what extent your higher end beings could be classified (although not necessarily subject to) an alignment. My thinking here is that some of the really big guys would transcend concepts like lawfulness or neutrality.

Absolutely, I even have powers that let you transcend alignment. Certainly Time Lords and such like are unrateable with regards alignment.

historian said:
Thanks in advance, I know that these cut pretty close, but I would be remiss if I didn't pry a bit. :D

:)
 

Hey Bjorn mate! :)

Revenge of the Bjorn said:
Historian brought up some points I was wondering about the other day. Then I forgot....but yeah.

LOL! :D

Revenge of the Bjorn said:
Three more questions for you Oh Krustaceous one:

Okay.

Revenge of the Bjorn said:
1) Did you ever make a decision in reference to the inclusion or lack thereof of Huper-Ouranoi? And if the answer's no would you care to divulge the information you have on them?

The nature of the Huper-Ouranioi has changed somewhat. That is now the name of the Angelic Over-Choir.

But don't worry, the previous incarnation of the Huper-Ouranioi is still detailed...only its now under a different name. ;)

Revenge of the Bjorn said:
2) The fact that you have many levels of higher and higher divinities reminds me a bit of my limited knowledge of Gnosticism, was that at all an inspiration to that idea or any other part of your work? Did any other interesting religious ideas (Qabbala, etc.) influence the work?

Yes.

Revenge of the Bjorn said:
3) Do our constant questions ever get annoying or frustrating? I mean seriously how can you deal with all the crap we ask you? :D

I am happy to reply to people who are interested in what I am working on.

I do sometimes look at the clock and think "surely I havn't just spent the last five hours replying to messages and emails!?" But usually I don't mind the distraction as the feedback is often useful.
 

Upper_Krust said:
Hiya mate! :)



Fire away.



Well, of course I'll try and describe such beings to the best of my ability. As well as providing as much advice on different campaign models as I can.





Absolutely, I even have powers that let you transcend alignment. Certainly Time Lords and such like are unrateable with regards alignment.



:)


I'm sure you'll do a great job describing the beings w/tips on how to play them :p , you've had a great deal more experience thinking about and playing this stuff than most of us and I'm sure you'll clearly impart that wisdom on the neophyte.



SWEET on the transcending alignment thing, I can't wait to see what this means in terms of game mechanics.
 

Hiya mate! :)

historian said:
I'm sure you'll do a great job describing the beings w/tips on how to play them :p ,

Well I'll certainly try my best.

historian said:
you've had a great deal more experience thinking about and playing this stuff than most of us and I'm sure you'll clearly impart that wisdom on the neophyte.

I appreciate the confidence mate! :)

historian said:
SWEET on the transcending alignment thing, I can't wait to see what this means in terms of game mechanics.

No sense going into that now. ;)
 

Upper_Krust said:
I had to go out earlier otherwise I would have had the reply done sooner.

No worries. I kind of forgot I posted in this topic myself for a few days there.

In a way, yes. Though I don't see all Greater Deities needing a Pantheon beneath them (obviously); I think the nominal head of a Pantheon should be clearly above and beyond the others (except in cases where there is more than one nominal ruler).

Out of curiosity, how far above them would you rank them (in terms of WotC's rankings)? Just one divine rank lower, or what? The reason I ask is that it doesn't seem like a pantheon head could be clearly "above and beyond" the others without seriously lowering the rest of the pantheon's might. That is, even if the pantheon head were a Greater deity, a group of Intermediate deities working together could still slay said Greater deity.

Indeed, Intermediate God status is a useful tool. Though individual Divine Ranks are more a waste of time than anything else.

Given your preference for a wider range of distinct levels, I can see how this "rank within level" system would annoy you, but still, given WotC, this is a step in the right direction, as it does allow, for example, a pantheon head to have more power (if only nominally) than other gods, even ones of the same rank.

WotC scaled back their Demon and Devil Lords so that people could interact with them on a non-epic (or divine) basis. While theres nothing wrong with that in itself, my own iterations pay homage to such beings rightful (and original) status.

This statement confuses me...in 1E D&D (the original for these beings) these Lords were as they are now...non-divine beings that were regarded as very powerful and unique, but not epic (in the "epic level" sense of the word). Hence why Orcus, Asmodeus, etc., were in the MM alongside the goblin and kobold and others.

Don't get me wrong, my favorite incarnation of these same beings is their 2E incarnations (the ones I was first familiar with), but their presentation in the BoVD seems to be a large look back at their origins.

That would be incongruous. You can't have gaping holes in demonic evolution (for instance).

This I disagree with, at least at the higher levels of power. If you have a demonic Greater deity, for example, you needn't then by necessity have one that is an Intermediate deity somewhere. It is incongruous at the lower echelons of power, since the bottom rungs are always what support the rest, but the higher you go, they get rarer and rarer, until its a crap shoot that any exist as X level...which doesn't mean there won't be any at the level above that.

That said, I only really want to present workable guidelines, rather than a concrete cosmos - because most DMs will have their own ideas about this anyway.

Point taken. I know I would certainly find a somewhat-generic toolkit more useful than if you went through the entire D&D cosmology and repainted it with your own brush-strokes.

I agree (though all spirits do have at worst a loose hierarchy of power, even the Slaad*), but you can't have gaping holes in such a hierarchy without feasible reasoning.

Agreed, I just think that reasoning need not be obvious. As I said, the hierarchy should have every slot filled at the lower levels, but higher up is another story...as an example...if only one Slaad Lord (say, Ygorl) ascended to become a demigod...then rose to become a Lesser god...we now have a prime example of what I meant. There is a Slaad Lesser deity around, but no demigod...and there need not be one. Below that is still Ssendam, Renbuu, Chorst, and Bazim-Gorag at their quasi-divine power level.

Of course Slaadi are not chaos incarnate, but thats a discussion for another time.

I won't comment on that for now...but you are sooo tempting me! :D

It was never fully explained why Demogorgon was a Lesser Deity; Lolth was an Intermediate Deity and Graz'zt was 'just a powerful demon' back in 2nd Ed.

I remember, and I still feel that that was probably the best depiction of those beings we've ever seen.

Within certain parameters yes. But I don't think divine status is one of those flexible parameters, at least not without due reason or some blurring of the edges.

Clearly Demogorgon, Orcus and Graz'zt (among others) are on the same 'strata' with regards power. Whether this is power from glory (worshippers) or power gained through battle all amounts to the same thing.

Even though we know, for example, that Graz'zt does not want to become a god, whereas Orcus and Demogorgon certainly do want that?

That may seem, as an example, to leave Graz'zt open to being squished like some mundane flea, but given that there are plenty of other beings who are less powerful than their enemies but manage to not only survive, but vex said enemies, that would seem to indicate that that system works somehow.

So they do. Thats what they are made from.

This I disagree with. To my way of thinking, Outsiders are a blend of physical material and the substance of their plane. No divinity involved. Divine power is something else altogether that's added to the mix. Otherwise, even the lowliest of manes, for example, would have some divinity in them, which doesn't seem right.

Not necessarily, its okay to keep mortals 'in the dark' about such things, but once your PCs become hero-deities they will come to find they are yet again small fish in a large pond...how large the pond depends on the DM.

Point taken. I was using the previous example to refer to a group of level 1-20 PCs. The scale would have to be upped when PCs reach divinity themselves. What I was attempting impart was that, for my group, I'd want them to have a high sense of awe that they were about to fight a Hero-god even if the PCs were all at 20th level.

I agree up to a point, though as a general rule of thumb position and power should go hand in hand (in the Outer Planes at least).

And, as you said, I agree to a point. I'm not sure though what position you feel that Lolth and Demogorgon both had that means that their power should be similarly equated.

The only one I can think of is their mutual positions as Tanar'ri/Demon Lords. However, that seems inherently fallacious because, unlike, say, the Lords of the Nine, Demon Lord carries far less of a strict rank of power...a Demon Lord can be any Demon NPC with unique stats who has a demesne in the Abyss...beyond that, it doesn't matter if their relatively weak or a Greater Deity...not all Demon Lords are equal. That's how I viewed it at least.

In Abyssal politics power is everything, the strong seek to dominate the weak. As you yourself pose, once one has an advantage abyssal politics will shift to counter such. Were Lolth to move against Orcus; Zuggtmoy may aid him. While Demogorgon may aid Lolth; Graz'zt must step in to check Lolth/Demogorgons advantage etc. etc. But centuries of constant war have forged the current hierarchy and stalemate to the position its in today. Which is why the upper echelons are 'roughly' balanced. While monarch may still war against monarch, none have a clear advantage.

But that assumes that today's position is at such a stalement (assuming such a stalemate ever even truly occurs in the chaotic Abyss). It could still be very much in the period of "constant" war that is eliminating the weak to make room for the strong. The death of Orcus at the hands of Kiaransalee, among other incidents, would seem to be a nod towards that. And as I mentioned, the Abyss doesn't seem like it'd ever reach such a stalemate.

Likewise, just because Lolth is an Intermediate Power doesn't mean that Demogorgon cannot be.

True, but I was looking for more of a reason why he should be, since "just because Lolth is" doesn't seem like enough of a reason.

I can't help but think such a weakness would be clearly perceived and exploited by an enemy.

I mean think about it. Does an army generally consist of a single 20th-level General leading hundreds or thousands of 1st-levelers!? Of course not, within the ranks are soldiers of variable experience the more powerful acting as Colonels; Captains; Lieutenants etc.

A good analogy, but that would seem to indicate that every race with only a single god should then have a series of beings between the leaders of that race and their deity. Do the illithids then, for example, need some "fillers" between the ulitharids (noble illithids) and Ilsensine himself?

I'll give it some thought. Thanks for the feedback mate. :)

Anytime. Btw, any word on when, exactly, we'll see the Open-Sourcing of the necessary materials from the ELH and D&Dg so that the IH can finally be published? I remember you said you'd been tipped off that those books would be added to the SRD, allowing you to then publish the IH, sometime back around April. How is that coming, since the ELH barely got any material added, and none has been included from D&Dg?
 
Last edited:

Hi Alzrius mate! :)

Alzrius said:
No worries. I kind of forgot I posted in this topic myself for a few days there.

Its easily done.

Alzrius said:
Out of curiosity, how far above them would you rank them (in terms of WotC's rankings)? Just one divine rank lower, or what?

I would probably use one divine status as a general rule of thumb, you don't want to get too carried away.

Alzrius said:
The reason I ask is that it doesn't seem like a pantheon head could be clearly "above and beyond" the others without seriously lowering the rest of the pantheon's might.

But all pantheons would be treated thusly.

Alzrius said:
That is, even if the pantheon head were a Greater deity, a group of Intermediate deities working together could still slay said Greater deity.

But no one deity in the Pantheon could challenge them.

Alzrius said:
Given your preference for a wider range of distinct levels, I can see how this "rank within level" system would annoy you, but still, given WotC, this is a step in the right direction, as it does allow, for example, a pantheon head to have more power (if only nominally) than other gods, even ones of the same rank.

Even from a mechanical point of view its a total distraction to fracture divinity into yet smaller component parts. At epic/immortal levels you want things to be as simple as possible.

Alzrius said:
This statement confuses me...in 1E D&D (the original for these beings) these Lords were as they are now...non-divine beings that were regarded as very powerful and unique, but not epic (in the "epic level" sense of the word).

1st Ed. Deities & Demigods (Legends & Lore print) outlined that all such unique creatures were equivalent to Lesser Gods; here it is word for word:

1st Ed. Legends & Lore pg. 90 said:
NOTE:The following beings from the MONSTER MANUAL and the FIEND FOLIO should be treated as Lesser Gods, though they very rarely have human worshippers:

MONSTER MANUAL

Demon:
Demogorgon
Juiblex
Orcus
Yeenoghu

Devil:
Asmodeus
Baalzebul
Dispater
Geryon

Dragon:
Bahamut
Tiamat

FIEND FOLIO

Demon:
Lolth (detailed in this volume)

Elemental Princes of Evil

Slaad:
Ssendam
Ygorl

Note that this was prior to (1st Ed.) Monster Manual 2, but obviously sets the guidelines for that books unique creatures too.

Alzrius said:
Hence why Orcus, Asmodeus, etc., were in the MM alongside the goblin and kobold and others.

Even the divine can be monstrous.

Alzrius said:
Don't get me wrong, my favorite incarnation of these same beings is their 2E incarnations (the ones I was first familiar with),

Trust me when I say that 2nd Ed. was their darkest hour. :(

Alzrius said:
but their presentation in the BoVD seems to be a large look back at their origins.

I remember reading some argument of Monte's that he said this was how such beings were initially detailed in 1st Ed. and that the BoVD was simply bringing them back to their roots; but this was of course not quite the full story (as I have shown). It doesn't feel right that the likes of Bahamut and Tiamat are Lesser Deities; and Lolth is an Intermediate deity when you have their former peers (and betters in some cases) languishing as mere quasi-gods.

Alzrius said:
This I disagree with, at least at the higher levels of power. If you have a demonic Greater deity, for example, you needn't then by necessity have one that is an Intermediate deity somewhere. It is incongruous at the lower echelons of power, since the bottom rungs are always what support the rest, but the higher you go, they get rarer and rarer, until its a crap shoot that any exist as X level...which doesn't mean there won't be any at the level above that.

Obviously thats the case at the very top but the hierarchy of the Abyss (to use one example) is well established at least until you reach the Demon Monarchs.

Alzrius said:
Point taken. I know I would certainly find a somewhat-generic toolkit more useful than if you went through the entire D&D cosmology and repainted it with your own brush-strokes.

Indeed.

Alzrius said:
Agreed, I just think that reasoning need not be obvious.

As long as its obvious to me. :p

Alzrius said:
As I said, the hierarchy should have every slot filled at the lower levels, but higher up is another story...as an example...if only one Slaad Lord (say, Ygorl) ascended to become a demigod...then rose to become a Lesser god...we now have a prime example of what I meant. There is a Slaad Lesser deity around, but no demigod...and there need not be one. Below that is still Ssendam, Renbuu, Chorst, and Bazim-Gorag at their quasi-divine power level.

Another thing to consider is planar power. If the Slaad only have one Lesser God; three Demigods and a Quasi-deity its not going to be very long before they are invaded and conquered (probably by some conspiring Abyssal Rulers in one of their more expansionistic moments).

Alzrius said:
I won't comment on that for now...but you are sooo tempting me! :D

;)

Alzrius said:
I remember, and I still feel that that was probably the best depiction of those beings we've ever seen.

The best ever depictions of the lower planes are from Gary Gygax' Gord the Rogue series of novels.

Alzrius said:
Even though we know, for example, that Graz'zt does not want to become a god, whereas Orcus and Demogorgon certainly do want that?

Thats the sort of jive that makes 2nd Ed. all the more dangerous to young minds. Obviously Graz'zt wants as much power as possible; the very idea that he would not want to become a god (or godlike) is laughable.

That said they could have meant he is less inclined to facilitate worship. The Immortals Handbook distinguishes between power gained through worship and personal power/divinity (derived 'quickening' style). But they all add up to the same thing.

'Immortals' (such as demons) may have a higher percentage of personal power whilst 'Deities' (such as the Norse Pantheon) would likely have a higher percentage from worship. But there is no real black and white here. So Graz'zt may well have some worshippers whilst Thor would have likely some personal power derived from victories over the millenia.

Alzrius said:
That may seem, as an example, to leave Graz'zt open to being squished like some mundane flea,

Yes it would.

Alzrius said:
but given that there are plenty of other beings who are less powerful than their enemies but manage to not only survive, but vex said enemies, that would seem to indicate that that system works somehow.

I think you are refering to enemies who are not 'out in the open' (as indeed Graz'zt is). The only time less powerful enemies survive is when they can hide. Graz'zt rules over a number of layers of the Abyss. He can't hide without giving up his territory.

Alzrius said:
This I disagree with. To my way of thinking, Outsiders are a blend of physical material and the substance of their plane. No divinity involved. Divine power is something else altogether that's added to the mix. Otherwise, even the lowliest of manes, for example, would have some divinity in them, which doesn't seem right.

Perhaps divinity is too strong a term for you. Think 'spirit'.

Alzrius said:
Point taken. I was using the previous example to refer to a group of level 1-20 PCs. The scale would have to be upped when PCs reach divinity themselves.

Naturally.

Alzrius said:
What I was attempting impart was that, for my group, I'd want them to have a high sense of awe that they were about to fight a Hero-god even if the PCs were all at 20th level.

Absolutely.

Alzrius said:
And, as you said, I agree to a point. I'm not sure though what position you feel that Lolth and Demogorgon both had that means that their power should be similarly equated.

They are both Demon Monarchs.

Alzrius said:
The only one I can think of is their mutual positions as Tanar'ri/Demon Lords. However, that seems inherently fallacious because, unlike, say, the Lords of the Nine, Demon Lord carries far less of a strict rank of power...a Demon Lord can be any Demon NPC with unique stats who has a demesne in the Abyss...beyond that, it doesn't matter if their relatively weak or a Greater Deity...not all Demon Lords are equal. That's how I viewed it at least.

"Demon Lord: A being of power who rules part of a layer of the Abyss."
"Demon Prince: A being of power who rules at least one complete layer of the Abyss and who is served by one or more Demon Lords."
"Demon Monarch: A being of power who rules multiple layers of the Abyss and who is served by one or more Demon Princes."

Alzrius said:
But that assumes that today's position is at such a stalement (assuming such a stalemate ever even truly occurs in the chaotic Abyss).

Well the various powers that be are always looking for one advantage or another. There is also the possibility of outside interference (The Gord the Rogue novels give a good depiction of how something can upset the balance of the Abyss).

Alzrius said:
It could still be very much in the period of "constant" war that is eliminating the weak to make room for the strong. The death of Orcus at the hands of Kiaransalee, among other incidents, would seem to be a nod towards that. And as I mentioned, the Abyss doesn't seem like it'd ever reach such a stalemate.

More 2nd Ed. jive. Why did Kiaransalee assassinate Orcus in the first place? Did she not have the brains to understand that eliminating one Demon Monarch would have brought the whole race down on her stupid head. No one in the Abyss is going to tolerate such an afront to demonkind not perpetrated by one of their own.

Alzrius said:
True, but I was looking for more of a reason why he should be, since "just because Lolth is" doesn't seem like enough of a reason.

They are both Demon Monarchs.

Alzrius said:
A good analogy, but that would seem to indicate that every race with only a single god should then have a series of beings between the leaders of that race and their deity.

Almost universally that will be the case. In any society in D&D

Alzrius said:
Do the illithids then, for example, need some "fillers" between the ulitharids (noble illithids) and Ilsensine himself?

Unless you have a specific reason* you would have to imagine that over time certain Ulitharids will become Hero-deities; Quasi-deities or possibly even Demigods. Perhaps Ilsensine will spawn some offspring to fill such roles.

*Such as the Githyanki Queen Demigod murdering all Githyanki over 17th-level.

Alzrius said:
Anytime. Btw, any word on when, exactly, we'll see the Open-Sourcing of the necessary materials from the ELH and D&Dg so that the IH can finally be published? I remember you said you'd been tipped off that those books would be added to the SRD, allowing you to then publish the IH, sometime back around April. How is that coming, since the ELH barely got any material added, and none has been included from D&Dg?

More WotC heel dragging.

I am not concerned about the OGL anymore though. I have scaled things back any ELH material to the bare essentials and if I can get a few weeks work on the IH I'll have it finished.
 

I have scaled things back any ELH material to the bare essentials and if I can get a few weeks work on the IH I'll have it finished.
Hmmm... both Fields of Blood and the Immortals Handbook actually seeing publication...

*** goes out to see if the skies are falling ***
 

Wow, all this talk of Demon Monarchs and stuff is really wakening my appetite :cool:

All this talking about Orcus wants that, Demogorgon wants this, Orcus is killed etc is from 2nd Ed., right?

Is that the same background that inspires the people at Dicefreaks?

Because I've no idea what it is all about.

2nd Ed. made me leave D&D for many many years and I wouldn't even touch 3rd ed. before I acidentially looked in a PHB to mine it for ideas for a d20 system. The rest is history. :)

So I'm very pleased that the IH will not refer to 2nd ed material that I have no interest in. Very pleased.
That is the case, right?

There won't be anything needed besides the core books? (and maybe the ELH).

Later,
 

Remove ads

Top