Hi there Kerrick!
Kerrick said:
I scanned through this thread, and I'm really interested to see what you've got to offer.
Thanks I appreciate the interestmate!
Kerrick said:
I downloaded the CR charts you posted, and they're invaluable (even if I have to guesstimate on some things).
Just to let you know the pdfs I posted are merely work in progress; prototypes if you will. Version 4 (which I am currently finishing off) will (I think) be the definitive treatise on CR/EL.
I plan on sending it to Dragon Magazine, as was suggested by Ed Stark.
Kerrick said:
The Brood is also working on a Legendary Handbook (for 20+ level play);
Excellent. I had hoped I wasn't the only one!
The problem I have found with writing the book I always wanted to read is that it doesn't have the same feeling of anticipation and surprise. Its like you already know what you're getting for Christmas.
So I will be really looking forward to whatever Epic/Immortal material other people come up with! You can definately count on me to get your book.
Kerrick said:
our campaign world has been around for 20+ years, and epic-level play is a large part of the world.
Our campaign has been active for almost that long as well. I have been playing the same Immortal character on/off for over 15 years.
Kerrick said:
Hmm... I've also come up with an alternate, level-based system, which seems to work, though I haven't had the chance to playtest it
I developed a system about 18 months ago (prior to the Epic Level Handbook). I was planning on using the Epic Spell System but too many people have related that they are unhappy with it. Though I still hope to have an adequate conversion system (and a few chanes I was planning to instigate) for the few that still plan on using the epic spell system.
Kerrick said:
(our epic campaign is on hold for a few months while we get things caught up in the campaign world and get the LHB at least partially done).
Coincidentally enough the immortal aspects of our campaign have been on hiatus until I finish the IH.
Kerrick said:
I have written up about 60 spells, and they are all reasonably balanced, so it bodes well for the system.
I have written a similar number of spells (not counting modified versions of current spells).
Kerrick said:
Oh yeah - I Dl'ed the Tomes; you have to use Notepad to open the first one.
I have notepad, but when I open the first one the formatting is all crushed together. I was able to view the second one easy enough though.
Kerrick said:
I scanned through some of the spells... the majority of them are badly written, and many of them are way off in level, but there are a few gems here and there.
It was an interesting read, though I agree it has balance issues and there were few truly high level concepts. Enjoyable though.