I think the stand-alone pantheon project sounds pretty cool. It would be hugely helpful in generating mythology-specific campaigns, among other things.
Krust, I'm curious - can you shed any light on what forces or affiliations your supernals might represent? The reason I ask is that, at least in my way of thinking, a pantheon would typically include beings ranging from demigod to greater god, but wouldn't necessarily include beings beyond this (i.e., Zeus, who I'm assuming fits into your greater god classification, is generally thought to be the most powerful member of the Olympian pantheon, at least as I am defining it). Is this definition of pantheon too narrow, or would supernals exist entirely outside of a pantheon - and, if supernals do exist outside of a pantheon, are they a more fundamental reprentation of a portfolio than the "lesser" deity-beings (entropy, murder, fire) and could they be classified by alignment (neutral good, etc.)?
Sorry about the compound question.
I also recognize that this inquiry calls for "spoiler" type information - feel free to answer some, none, or all of it. Thanks in advance for any input.
Krust, I'm curious - can you shed any light on what forces or affiliations your supernals might represent? The reason I ask is that, at least in my way of thinking, a pantheon would typically include beings ranging from demigod to greater god, but wouldn't necessarily include beings beyond this (i.e., Zeus, who I'm assuming fits into your greater god classification, is generally thought to be the most powerful member of the Olympian pantheon, at least as I am defining it). Is this definition of pantheon too narrow, or would supernals exist entirely outside of a pantheon - and, if supernals do exist outside of a pantheon, are they a more fundamental reprentation of a portfolio than the "lesser" deity-beings (entropy, murder, fire) and could they be classified by alignment (neutral good, etc.)?
Sorry about the compound question.

