D&D 5E (2024) Is 5E better because of Crawford and Perkins leaving?

[Maxperson]

I quoted the only time you mention the word stingers.

No matter how many times you claim you've said this three times, you really didn't. I challenge you to find it more than once. You can't because you didn't. And the one post you did say it, which I quoted, isn't nearly as clear as you seem to think it is.

First off, I said that I said it twice and wouldn't say it a third time. Second, in the first quote I mentioned stingers and shouldn't have had to mention it again. Just quoting the actual quote says EXACTLY what he asked for. A reason why stingers worked. If he can't be bothered to try and understand what I am saying, I can't be bothered to say it more clearly multiple times. Once is enough.

 

[ECMO3]

Twice I've quoted where it says very clearly that typically you show no signs before 50%. That's there so that stingers and such will still inflict poison, which I stated straight out the first time I quoted it.

Niether your earlier posts, nor the rules actually say what is in red. There is some wording about cuts and bruises but not this. Ignoring that for a moment:

So you have a stinger or something with poison, then the hit causes damage, but if you don't there is no damage until you get to 0 hps. So you have a poisoned dagger and hit an enemy once then yes it that really hits him, and does "actual damage" but if you hit him a second time with the same dagger it doesn't do any actual damage ..... even if say the second hit is a critical hit.

Is this what you really think the rules are?

Oh and what if it is poison damage caused by the poison and not the poisoned condition?