Ranger REG said:
That begs a question: Why is it that healthy meals are more expensive than fat-laced meals (at least a $1.50 on average)? If the price comes down on healthy meals, we wouldn't have an obesity as a friggin' health problem. I want to be able to buy a healthy meal for just $2.99, rather than $5.99.
Is lettuce, like gas, expensive these days? Is there an OPEC-like organization made up of lettuce farmers determining the price of healthy food?
I noticed this a while back. I normally refuse to eat at McDonalds, but a few months ago I was with some friends who insisted on eating there. When I went in, I didn't want to buy some fatty, fried, greasy excuse for a burger or food-substitute-product, so I thought I'd get a salad or something.
Then I realized how much they were charging for them. A tiny, basic salad the size of my hand would cost more than an entire combo meal. Just getting a salad and a bottle of water would cost several dollars more than any other meal, for much less food. Oddly, I can remember long ago when I was a kid and salads at McDonalds were big and filling. Part of me thinks it's quietly a plan to make the healthy foods unappealing, so they don't sell, then they can take them off the menu, and answer complaints about a lack of healthy options with data that healthy foods just didn't sell at all.
I guess that it's also easier to make the unhealthy foods because of preservatives and factory-scale mass production cut costs, but those things don't work well for salads, and things like free range and organic meats are going to be a lot more expensive since the normal farming methods came to prominence because of relative cheapness.
Personally, in terms of fast/chain resturants I prefer Chipotle, they use a lot of free range and organic foods, and you can really tell in terms of taste. Yeah, it's a buck or two more expensive than other fast food, but the quality really makes up for it.