gfunk said:
Pretty much. It seems that the others have neither the time nor inclination for powergaming. It might be worth noting that Lee (who plays Wathros) takes significant input from Joachim and myself with spell/feat selection.
Hehe, yup, why let the talents of these fellows go to waste? Although I do sometimes go "bah.. no, Doing this now." Such as taking the natural casting at a rather low level as a feat, which I think has worked out nicely. I definately owe strategic character advice to our two resident experts.
gfunk said:
It simply came up that way. Since we were starting 3.5, a lot of us wanted to try something new. The big lure was classes we had never played before like druids and barbarians because they had been re-tooled and re-balanced to match with spellcasters at higher levels. Also, I think many of us want to play classes where you get something interesting at each level..
Agreed Gfunk, I wanted to try out the new retooled Ranger, and then to not do the same thing, Druid, from the new 3.5. I must say it has turned out well.
Not only does the driud have reasonable hit points and some decent offensive spells, the animal companion is certainly pretty handy to have in many situations.
oh, best quote from the game for me (I died laughing)
“What happened?” Pez asked.
“The elf turned inta a bird and flew away,” Gardrid said dryly.
“No, seriously,” Pez said.
