John Crichton
First Post
It's all good. I thought The Rock looked like a piece of dreck and didn't give it a single chance until I was dragged to see it by a friend of mine. I really enjoyed the movie. The action was done well and the movie was so over-the-top that it was entertaining. But that's Michael Bay for you. All his films are like that. I thought it was a huge mistake for him to try something like Pearl Harbor. As for JB, this seems like a pretty good cast he has put together. Considering all the crummy Arthur-based films out there, there is certainly room for another try. Now that Hollywood really likes these like of movies (as opposed to like liking them) it is the perfect time to try a different take.LightPhoenix said:Eek, sorry to jump in late!
Jerry Bruckheimer... I'll tell you exactly why his name attached to this film makes me tremble with fear. He's incredibly hit-or-miss. Some of his films have been great and some have been incredibly crappy. I mean, this is the same guy that can be associated with Kangaroo Jack and then follow it up with Pirates of the Caribbean.
Oh, and whip out the commies again... I'm the only person I know that hated The Rock. Not even Connery could save that piece of tripe.
Every big-time producer is going to have some stinkers under his belt and JB is no exception. I'm waiting for a trailer to start a real opinion. Right now we have very little to go on and I would rather have them give this subject matter a shot than not. Unless it is as bad as the D&D movie, that is...
