Still friendlier than most online conversations.HOW DARE YOU
Still friendlier than most online conversations.HOW DARE YOU
Have been on Usenet [1] since ~1990. Can confirm.Still friendlier than most online conversations.
Wow, I should see if I can still access my old account.Have been on Usenet [1] since ~1990. Can confirm.
[1] Yes, Usenet is still there [2] .
[2] Barely.
I guess you may have deleted, but this isn't critical thinking on your part, brah, this is naivete and a sad lack of genuinely critical thinking.
There are plenty of fascists, even actual Nazis or Nazi-adjacent people who are non-white and follow "non-white" religions. The Nazi leadership tended to oppose/conflict with Christianity, remember.
For example, the RSS in India were directly inspired by and very keen on the Nazis (albeit even more keen on Mussolini's fascists):
Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
It's a common modern fallacy to believe that the Nazis hated people solely based on skin colour or the like. They had a deeply bizarre and almost incomprehensible racial ideology when it came down to (which wasn't fixed, either), which included several non-white groups as "Aryans" (including the Nepalese), and included the usually-regarded-as-white-today "Slavs" as "subhuman".
So the fact that Barker fantasized about a non-white world doesn't mean much. Nor does the fact that he was a Muslim. Islamofascism is as old as fascism, almost:
Islamofascism - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Nor is being a Muslim incompatible with antisemitism, which is rife in Serpent's Walk. So not only do we know that he wrote Serpent's Walk, which is unabashedly pro-Nazi book, none of your reasoning that he "couldn't be" a Nazi holds up to the slightest analysis.
In fact we also know he was on the editorial board of the Journal of Historical Review, which was dedicated to holocaust denial and revisionist psuedohistory.
MAR Barker was absolutely keen on Nazis.
How do I delete my account?
Worth noting that even if Barker wasn't an actual uniform-wearing, goose-stepping nazi, he can still be (and by the available evidence certainly was) an anti-Semite.My apologies for the drive-by posting.
I stumbled on this thread and was appalled to learn that one of my favorite game designers / world-builders may be a Nazi. As a Jew this offended me greatly. But, then I decided to engage in some critical thinking.
1. MAR Barker spent his life fantasizing and writing about a science-fantasy world, much more advanced than ours, of 'non-white' people. This doesn't sound like a person who subscribes to white supremacy ideology.
2. Barker converted from Christianity (a primarily 'white' religion) to Islam (a primarily 'non-white' religion).
3. Writing about Nazis does not make someone a nazi. Are the writers of 'The Man in the Castle' aired on Amazon Prime nazi sympathizers since they envision a world where the nazis won?
The irony of this thread is that the nazis power base was based on group think and toeing the party line regardless of what critical thinking would otherwise indicate. You guys can do better.
I'll immediately remove my account. But, please consider my words before posthumously destroying someone without evidence.
Barker was on the editorial board of that publication for around a decade. All of the issues are on the Internet Archive.Just in case anyone decides they want to challenge this on the basis that Wikipedia is suspect, here's a scanned pdf copy of "The Journal of Historical Review Volume 09-Number-4-1989" on Scribd, which shows Philip Barker, Ph.D. as a member of the editorial advisory committee on page 2:
Edit: I didn't know a Scribd link would be embedded now. Spoiler tags added.