Yaarel
🇮🇱 🇺🇦 He-Mage
... would I prepare that spell, no most likely not. Would as a wizard I want that in my book so I can ritually it out whenever I need, yes absolutely.
Yeah, rituals feel like a different silo from the slot-spending "action" spells.Three of these are rituals (as are four of the spells in the categories above). That, I think, is telling: it suggests that your problem is with rituals spells (which is reinforced with the new ritual rules -- bring back ritual casting from before). I have had characters take Ritual caster in order to have access to Floating Disk and Unseen Servant specifically. ... Rituals have a real place in the game, and they don't all need to be cranked up to 11, unless players have to squeeze out more effective options because space is limited (as with the new Rit Caster feat).
Also, a ritual can be for anything, including for an effect that is unrelated to a spell list.
Perhaps, all rituals should instead be skill checks?
Then noncasters can also train in the corresponding skill to perform a ritual.
Maybe merge Comprehend Languages with Tongues to make a 1st-slot spell that is useful for encounters. But even this might work better as a skill check ritual.I agree with all of these except Comprhend Languages. You can learn the languages, or use magic. History is not a substitute.Comprehend languages is an invaluable first-level spell for some campaigns, and is exactly what a ritual first-level spell should be.
Meanwhile using the History skill to "decode" a language or dialect is also ok.
Ceremony is fine for a "ritual". Maybe the Religion skill check can perform it?Ceremony should never have been introduced. It is terrible. Ceremonies should not have a mechanical effect, and should be what the Acolyte background lets you do.
Altho I am suggesting skill checks, I feel it is ok for each ritual to have a character level prerequisite (similar to the way a feat does).